Durongpisitkul Kritvikrom, Dangrungroj Ekkachai, Chungsomprasong Paweena, Vijarnsorn Chodchanok, Chanthong Prakul, Pacharapakornpong Thita, Kanjanauthai Supaluck, Soongswang Jarupim, Panjasamanvong Porntip, Plearntummakun Pornrawee, Tocharoenchok Teerapong, Nitiyarom Ekarat, Tantiwongkosri Kriangkrai, Thongcharoen Punnarerk, Subtaweesin Thaworn, Sriyoschati Somchai
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Pediatrics, Lerdsin Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Aug 2;1(5):100408. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100408. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) has become an alternative to surgical pulmonary valve placement (SPVR) for patients after tetralogy of Fallot repair. This study compared the outcomes of TPVR with those of SPVR.
We reviewed data from patients who underwent pulmonary valve replacement with a median of 2 years of follow-up.
Between 2010 and 2021, 215 patients underwent pulmonary valve replacement (72 TPVR and 143 SPVR). The median size of the right ventricular end-diastolic volume index in the TPVR group was 165 mL/m (IQR, 136-190) and 184 mL/m (IQR, 163-230) in the SPVR group ( = .001). The median value of the maximum landing zone at the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) in patients with native RVOT was 26 mm (IQR, 24-28) in the 43 patients in the TPVR group and 31 mm (IQR, 28-34) in the 101 patients in the SPVR group ( < .001). The median size of the pulmonary valve implant for the native RVOT in the TPVR group was 29.0 mm (IQR, 26.0-29.0) and 24.0 mm (IQR, 24.0-24.0) in the SPVR group ( < .001). There were no deaths in the TPVR group and 8 deaths in the SPVR group ( = .041). Major complications and the length of hospitalization were lower in the TPVR group ( = .001). After 2 years, the mean decrease in QRS duration was 5 milliseconds (IQR, 1-14) in the TPVR group and 1 millisecond (IQR, -4 to 10) in the SPVR group ( = .006).
TPVR allows for larger implants, resulting in lower mortality, shorter hospital stays, and fewer major cardiac events. SPVR may be preferable in patients with larger (>30 mm) native RVOT and in those who require concomitant surgical procedures.
经导管肺动脉瓣置换术(TPVR)已成为法洛四联症修复术后患者外科肺动脉瓣置入术(SPVR)的替代方案。本研究比较了TPVR与SPVR的治疗效果。
我们回顾了接受肺动脉瓣置换术患者的数据,并进行了中位时间为2年的随访。
2010年至2021年期间,215例患者接受了肺动脉瓣置换术(72例TPVR和143例SPVR)。TPVR组右心室舒张末期容积指数的中位数为165 mL/m²(四分位间距,136 - 190),SPVR组为184 mL/m²(四分位间距,163 - 230)(P = 0.001)。在TPVR组的43例天然右心室流出道(RVOT)患者中,右心室流出道最大着陆区的中位数为26 mm(四分位间距,24 - 28),在SPVR组的101例患者中为31 mm(四分位间距,28 - 34)(P < 0.001)。TPVR组天然RVOT肺动脉瓣植入物的中位数尺寸为29.0 mm(四分位间距,26.0 - 29.0),SPVR组为24.0 mm(四分位间距,24.0 - 24.0)(P < 0.001)。TPVR组无死亡病例,SPVR组有8例死亡(P = 0.041)。TPVR组的主要并发症和住院时间更低(P = 0.001)。2年后,TPVR组QRS时限的平均缩短值为5毫秒(四分位间距,1 - 14),SPVR组为1毫秒(四分位间距,-4至10)(P = 0.006)。
TPVR可使用更大尺寸的植入物,从而降低死亡率、缩短住院时间并减少主要心脏事件。对于天然RVOT较大(>30 mm)的患者以及需要同时进行外科手术的患者,SPVR可能更可取。