Flinders University Institute of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Nov;57(11):2235-2245. doi: 10.1002/eat.24271. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
This study examines the factorial structure and psychometric properties of the Eating Disorder-15 questionnaire (ED-15) in a large clinical sample, as well as the instrument's sensitivity to early clinical change in therapy and ability to measure remission.
Participants with eating disorders (N = 278) referred to the Flinders University Services for Eating Disorders in South Australia completed the ED-15 as well as other measures of eating disorder symptoms and co-occurring psychopathology, including depression, anxiety, and stress.
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed a two-factor model for the ED-15. The ED-15 had good internal consistency. It showed satisfactory concurrent validity with moderate correlations with the EDE-Q global score and contribution of unique variance to that score. Correlations indicated good convergent validity with clinical impairment and good divergent validity from depression, anxiety, and stress. The ED-15 showed a significant medium effect size change within the first four sessions of therapy. Good discriminant validity was indicated by cut-off scores used for remission, with significantly different levels of ED psychopathology and other impairments between the two groups.
This study adds to the four previous psychometric studies of the ED-15, confirming robustness of the English version in a clinical sample. The brevity and psychometric robustness of the ED-15 makes it a preferable measure to the Eating Disorder Examination for sessional assessment of progress in treatment.
本研究在一个大型临床样本中检验了饮食障碍-15 问卷(ED-15)的因子结构和心理测量特性,以及该工具对治疗早期临床变化的敏感性和衡量缓解的能力。
南澳大利亚弗林德斯大学饮食障碍服务机构转介的饮食障碍患者(N=278)完成了 ED-15 以及其他饮食障碍症状和同时存在的精神病理学的测量,包括抑郁、焦虑和压力。
验证性因子分析(CFA)显示 ED-15 的两因素模型。ED-15 具有良好的内部一致性。它与 EDE-Q 总分具有中等相关性,并对该分数有独特的方差贡献,显示出满意的同时效度。与临床损伤的相关性表明具有良好的会聚有效性,与抑郁、焦虑和压力具有良好的发散有效性。ED-15 在治疗的前四个疗程中显示出显著的中等效应量变化。使用缓解的截止分数表明具有良好的判别有效性,两组之间的 ED 精神病理学和其他损伤水平有显著差异。
本研究增加了 ED-15 的四项先前心理测量研究,证实了英文版在临床样本中的稳健性。ED-15 的简洁性和心理测量稳健性使其成为治疗过程中会话评估进展的首选量表,优于饮食障碍检查。