Department of Biology, Eastern Washington University, Cheney, Washington, USA.
Patrick Center for Environmental Research, Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2024 Sep;34(6):e3016. doi: 10.1002/eap.3016. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
Understanding the relationship between a dam's size and its ecological effects is important for prioritization of river restoration efforts based on dam removal. Although much is known about the effects of large storage dams, this information may not be applicable to small dams, which represent the vast majority of dams being considered for removal. To better understand how dam effects vary with size, we conducted a multidisciplinary study of the downstream effect of dams on a range of ecological characteristics including geomorphology, water chemistry, periphyton, riparian vegetation, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. We related dam size variables to the downstream-upstream fractional difference in measured ecological characteristics for 16 dams in the mid-Atlantic region ranging from 0.9 to 57 m high, with hydraulic residence times (HRTs) ranging from 30 min to 1.5 years. For a range of physical attributes, larger dams had larger effects. For example, the water surface width below dams was greater below large dams. By contrast, there was no effect of dam size on sediment grain size, though the fraction of fine-grained bed material was lower below dams independently of dam size. Larger dams tended to reduce water quality more, with decreased downstream dissolved oxygen and increased temperature. Larger dams decreased inorganic nutrients (N, P, Si), but increased particulate nutrients (N, P) in downstream reaches. Aquatic organisms tended to have greater dissimilarity in species composition below larger dams (for fish and periphyton), lower taxonomic diversity (for macroinvertebrates), and greater pollution tolerance (for periphyton and macroinvertebrates). Plants responded differently below large and small dams, with fewer invasive species below large dams, but more below small dams. Overall, these results demonstrate that larger dams have much greater impact on the ecosystem components we measured, and hence their removal has the greatest potential for restoring river ecosystems.
了解大坝规模与其生态影响之间的关系,对于根据大坝拆除来优先考虑河流恢复工作非常重要。尽管人们对大型储水大坝的影响有了很多了解,但这些信息可能不适用于那些正在考虑拆除的绝大多数小型大坝。为了更好地了解大坝的影响如何随规模而变化,我们对大坝对一系列生态特征的下游影响进行了多学科研究,这些生态特征包括地貌、水化学、周丛生物、河岸植被、底栖大型无脊椎动物和鱼类。我们将大坝尺寸变量与 16 座位于大西洋中部地区的大坝的测量生态特征的上下游分差相关联,这些大坝的高度从 0.9 到 57 米不等,水力停留时间(HRT)从 30 分钟到 1.5 年不等。对于一系列物理属性,较大的大坝具有更大的影响。例如,大坝下游的水面宽度在较大的大坝下游更大。相比之下,大坝的大小对泥沙粒径没有影响,但不管大坝的大小如何,细颗粒底质的比例都较低。较大的大坝往往会使水质恶化,下游溶解氧减少,温度升高。较大的大坝减少了无机养分(N、P、Si),但增加了下游的颗粒态养分(N、P)。水生生物在较大的大坝下游往往具有更大的物种组成差异(鱼类和周丛生物)、较低的分类多样性(大型无脊椎动物)和更高的耐污染性(周丛生物和大型无脊椎动物)。植物对大型和小型大坝的反应不同,大型大坝下游的入侵物种较少,但小型大坝下游的入侵物种较多。总体而言,这些结果表明,较大的大坝对我们测量的生态系统组成部分的影响要大得多,因此它们的拆除最有可能恢复河流生态系统。