• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 TeamBirth 背景下的患者自主性,这是一项质量改进干预措施,旨在改善分娩期间的共同决策。

Assessing patient autonomy in the context of TeamBirth, a quality improvement intervention to improve shared decision-making during labor and birth.

机构信息

Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Birth. 2024 Dec;51(4):855-866. doi: 10.1111/birt.12857. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1111/birt.12857
PMID:39140579
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Respectful maternity care includes shared decision-making (SDM). However, research on SDM is lacking from the intrapartum period and instruments to measure it have only recently been developed. TeamBirth is a quality improvement initiative that uses team huddles to improve SDM during labor and birth. Team huddles are structured meetings including the patient and full care team when the patient's preferences, care plans, and expectations for when the next huddle will occur are reviewed.

METHODS

We used patient survey data (n = 1253) from a prospective observational study at four U.S. hospitals to examine the relationship between TeamBirth huddles and SDM. We measured SDM using the Mother's Autonomy in Decision-Making (MADM) scale. Linear regression models were used to assess the association between any exposure to huddles and the MADM score and between the number of huddles and the MADM score.

RESULTS

In our multivariable model, experiencing a huddle was significantly associated with a 3.13-point higher MADM score. When compared with receiving one huddle, experiencing 6+ huddles yielded a 3.64-point higher MADM score.

DISCUSSION

Patients reporting at least one TeamBirth huddle experienced significantly higher SDM, as measured by the MADM scale. Our findings align with prior research that found actively involving the patient in their care by creating structured opportunities to discuss preferences and choices enables SDM. We also demonstrated that MADM is sensitive to hospital-based quality improvement, suggesting that future labor and birth interventions might adopt MADM as a patient-reported experience measure.

摘要

背景

尊重产妇护理包括共同决策(SDM)。然而,在分娩期间,关于 SDM 的研究很少,并且最近才开发出衡量它的工具。TeamBirth 是一项质量改进计划,它使用团队围堵来改善分娩期间的 SDM。团队围堵是一种结构化的会议,包括患者和整个护理团队,在会上审查患者的偏好、护理计划以及下一次围堵的时间。

方法

我们使用了来自美国四家医院的前瞻性观察研究中的患者调查数据(n=1253),以检查 TeamBirth 围堵与 SDM 之间的关系。我们使用母亲决策自主性量表(MADM)来衡量 SDM。线性回归模型用于评估任何接触围堵与 MADM 评分之间的关联,以及围堵次数与 MADM 评分之间的关联。

结果

在我们的多变量模型中,经历围堵与 MADM 评分高 3.13 分显著相关。与经历一次围堵相比,经历 6 次以上围堵的患者 MADM 评分高 3.64 分。

讨论

报告至少经历过一次 TeamBirth 围堵的患者,其 SDM 明显更高,这是通过 MADM 量表衡量的。我们的研究结果与先前的研究一致,即通过创建讨论偏好和选择的结构化机会,积极参与患者护理,可以实现 SDM。我们还表明,MADM 对基于医院的质量改进敏感,这表明未来的分娩干预措施可能会采用 MADM 作为患者报告的体验测量指标。

相似文献

1
Assessing patient autonomy in the context of TeamBirth, a quality improvement intervention to improve shared decision-making during labor and birth.评估 TeamBirth 背景下的患者自主性,这是一项质量改进干预措施,旨在改善分娩期间的共同决策。
Birth. 2024 Dec;51(4):855-866. doi: 10.1111/birt.12857. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Improving communication and teamwork during labor: A feasibility, acceptability, and safety study.改善分娩期间的沟通和团队合作:一项可行性、可接受性和安全性研究。
Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):637-647. doi: 10.1111/birt.12630. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
3
Implementation strategies within a complex environment: A qualitative study of a shared decision-making intervention during childbirth.复杂环境下的实施策略:一项关于分娩过程中共享决策干预的定性研究。
Birth. 2022 Sep;49(3):440-454. doi: 10.1111/birt.12611. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
4
The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care.母亲决策自主权(MADM)量表:一种用于评估产妇护理体验的新工具的患者主导开发及心理测量测试
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0171804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171804. eCollection 2017.
5
The design of "TeamBirth": A care process to improve communication and teamwork during labor.“团队分娩”设计:改善分娩期间沟通和团队合作的护理流程。
Birth. 2021 Dec;48(4):534-540. doi: 10.1111/birt.12566. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
6
Assessing Dutch women's experiences of labour and birth: adaptations and psychometric evaluations of the measures Mothers on Autonomy in Decision Making Scale, Mothers on Respect Index, and Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0.评估荷兰女性的分娩经历:自主决策量表、尊重指数和生育体验问卷 2.0 的测量方法的调整和心理计量学评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04445-0.
7
Women's view on shared decision making and autonomy in childbirth: cohort study of Belgian women.女性对分娩中共享决策和自主权的看法:对比利时女性的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul 8;22(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04890-x.
8
Improving shared decision-making in a clinical obstetric ward by using the three questions intervention, a pilot study.采用三问题干预措施改善临床产科病房的共享决策:一项试点研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jul 4;18(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1921-z.
9
Shared decision-making in maternity care in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯产科学中的共同决策:一项横断面研究。
Midwifery. 2024 Nov;138:104147. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104147. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
10
Satisfaction in parturients receiving epidural analgesia after prenatal shared decision-making intervention: a prospective, before-and-after cohort study.产前共同决策干预后接受硬膜外镇痛的产妇的满意度:一项前瞻性、前后队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03085-6.