Suppr超能文献

在多中心随机CABASTY试验中,接受双周一次与三周一次卡巴他赛方案治疗的老年转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌男性患者的疼痛及健康相关生活质量

Pain and Health-related Quality of Life with Biweekly Versus Triweekly Cabazitaxel Schedule in Older Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the Multicenter, Randomized CABASTY Trial.

作者信息

Oudard Stephane, Tran Yohann, Helissey Carole, Vauchier Charles, Ratta Raffaele, Bennamoun Mostefa, Voog Eric, Hasbini Ali, Thiery-Vuillemin Antoine, Aldabbagh Kais, Saldana Carolina, Sevin Emmanuel, Amela Eric, Von Amsberg Gunhild, Houede Nadine, Besson Dominique, Feyerabend Susan, Boegemann Martin, Pfister David, Schostak Martin, Huillard Olivier, Di Fiore Frederic, Quivy Amandine, Vernerey Dewi, Falcoz Antoine, Youcef-Ali Karima, Kotti Salma, Lepicard Eve M, Barthelemy Philippe

机构信息

Medical oncology Department, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris Cité University, Paris, France; Association pour la Recherche de Thérapeutiques Innovantes en Cancérologie, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France.

Association pour la Recherche de Thérapeutiques Innovantes en Cancérologie, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France.

出版信息

Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Feb;8(1):126-134. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.011. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The CABASTY study showed that more frequent administration of a lower dose of cabazitaxel (CBZ) reduced toxicity in older men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), without compromising efficacy. Here, we investigated the impact of a biweekly CBZ schedule on patient-reported pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS

We randomized 196 patients from 25 centers (1:1, stratified by age and G8 score) to the biweekly CBZ16 (CBZ 16 mg/m) experimental arm or the triweekly CBZ25 (CBZ 25 mg/m) control arm (CABASTY study, NCT02961257). We assessed pain using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and HRQoL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 141 patients were available for a pain and 160 for an HRQoL analysis. Median time to pain progression (stratified hazard ratio [HR]: 1.7, confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-4.22, p = 0.3) and median time to first opiate use (stratified HR: 1.05, CI: 0.44-2.55, p = 0.9) did not differ between arms. We did not see a significant difference in median time to deterioration of FACT-P total score between treatments (stratified HR: 0.88, CI: 0.47-1.7, p = 0.7). Interestingly, the time to onset of several adverse events was significantly longer in the biweekly CBZ16 group.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

HRQoL did not significantly differ between the biweekly CBZ16 and the standard schedule. Additionally, onset of some adverse events was delayed. These results may increase health care providers' confidence in using CBZ in older patients with mCRPC who are denied chemotherapy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors are often preferred to taxane chemotherapy as a treatment of second or subsequent line in older metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients due to more frequent treatment-related toxicities. Here, we showed that quality of life and pain did not differ significantly with an adapted schedule of cabazitaxel (CBZ), compared with the standard regimen. This CBZ schedule could increase eligibility of older patients for chemotherapy.

摘要

背景与目的

CABASTY研究表明,更频繁地给予较低剂量的卡巴他赛(CBZ)可降低老年转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)男性患者的毒性,且不影响疗效。在此,我们研究了每两周一次的CBZ给药方案对患者报告的疼痛及健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。

方法

我们将来自25个中心的196例患者(按年龄和G8评分分层,1:1随机分组)分为每两周一次的CBZ16(卡巴他赛16mg/m²)试验组或每三周一次的CBZ25(卡巴他赛25mg/m²)对照组(CABASTY研究,NCT02961257)。我们使用数字疼痛评分量表评估疼痛,并使用癌症治疗功能评估 - 前列腺(FACT - P)问卷评估HRQoL。

主要发现与局限性

共有141例患者可进行疼痛分析,160例可进行HRQoL分析。两组之间疼痛进展的中位时间(分层风险比[HR]:1.7,置信区间[CI]:0.67 - 4.22,p = 0.3)和首次使用阿片类药物的中位时间(分层HR:1.05,CI:0.44 - 2.55,p = 0.9)无差异。我们未观察到治疗之间FACT - P总分恶化的中位时间有显著差异(分层HR:0.88,CI:0.47 - 1.7,p = 0.7)。有趣的是,每两周一次的CBZ16组中几种不良事件的发生时间明显更长。

结论与临床意义

每两周一次的CBZ16方案与标准方案相比,HRQoL无显著差异。此外,一些不良事件的发生时间延迟。这些结果可能会增加医疗保健提供者对在拒绝化疗的老年mCRPC患者中使用CBZ的信心。

患者总结

由于更频繁的治疗相关毒性,雄激素受体途径抑制剂通常比紫杉烷化疗更受青睐,作为老年转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者二线或后续治疗的选择。在此,我们表明,与标准方案相比,卡巴他赛(CBZ)调整后的给药方案在生活质量和疼痛方面无显著差异。这种CBZ方案可能会增加老年患者接受化疗的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验