• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

镓-多柔比星-伊班膦酸盐与骨扫描用于检测乳腺癌骨转移的前瞻性比较

Prospective comparison of Ga-DOTA-ibandronate and bone scans for detecting bone metastases in breast cancer.

作者信息

Xiang Feifan, Zhang Yue, Tan Xiaoqi, Yan Yuanzhuo, Liu Huipan, Ma Wenzhe, Chen Yue

机构信息

The State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China.

Department of Orthopedic, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 31;14:1428498. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1428498. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1428498
PMID:39144828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11323743/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ga labeled DOTA-Ibandronate (Ga-DOTA-IBA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), is a novel bone-targeting imaging tracer and promising diagnostic method for bone metastases detection. Therefore, this study aimed to compare Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT to the Tc-MDP whole-body bone scan (WBBS) for detecting bone metastases in breast cancer (BC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 45 women with BC underwent imaging via Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT and Tc-MDP WBBS. Clinical and demographic information as well as BC imaging features were recorded. The two methods were compared in terms of their detection rate for bone metastases and the number of lesions.

RESULTS

The 45 women were aged 53.5 ± 11.0 years. The bone metastases detection rate with Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT was 100% (45/45) and with Tc-MDP WBBS was 95.6% (43/45). A total of 546 bone metastases lesions were detected. The lesion detection rate using Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT was 100% (546/546) and using Tc-MDP WBBS was 67.8% (370/546). More lesions were found at each site via Ga-DOTA-IBA than via Tc-MDP WBBS.

CONCLUSIONS

Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT is a more sensitive method than Tc-MDP WBBS for assessing bone metastases in BC and may therefore represent a useful imaging technique for bone metastases, while offering a visual basis for Lu-DOTA-IBA diagnosis and therapy response assessments for BC. Further validation using a broader study cohort is warranted to confirm these findings.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=170163, identifier ChiCTR2200064487.

摘要

引言

镓标记的DOTA-伊班膦酸盐(Ga-DOTA-IBA)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)是一种新型的骨靶向成像示踪剂,也是用于检测骨转移的有前景的诊断方法。因此,本研究旨在比较Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT与锝-亚甲基二膦酸盐全身骨扫描(WBBS)在检测乳腺癌(BC)骨转移方面的效果。

材料与方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,45例乳腺癌女性患者接受了Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT和锝-亚甲基二膦酸盐WBBS检查。记录临床和人口统计学信息以及乳腺癌的影像学特征。比较了两种方法在骨转移检测率和病变数量方面的差异。

结果

45例女性患者的年龄为53.5±11.0岁。Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT的骨转移检测率为100%(45/45),锝-亚甲基二膦酸盐WBBS的检测率为95.6%(43/45)。共检测到546处骨转移病变。使用Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT的病变检测率为100%(546/546),使用锝-亚甲基二膦酸盐WBBS的检测率为67.8%(370/546)。通过Ga-DOTA-IBA在每个部位发现的病变比通过锝-亚甲基二膦酸盐WBBS更多。

结论

对于评估乳腺癌骨转移,Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT比锝-亚甲基二膦酸盐WBBS更敏感,因此可能是一种用于骨转移的有用成像技术,同时为乳腺癌的镥-DOTA-IBA诊断和治疗反应评估提供视觉依据。有必要使用更广泛的研究队列进行进一步验证以证实这些发现。

临床试验注册

https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=170163,标识符ChiCTR2200064487。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb01/11323743/6e2cdf6d42c0/fonc-14-1428498-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb01/11323743/935fb2c4dbc7/fonc-14-1428498-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb01/11323743/d3468b09e825/fonc-14-1428498-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb01/11323743/1bab47bbfc0a/fonc-14-1428498-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb01/11323743/6e2cdf6d42c0/fonc-14-1428498-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb01/11323743/935fb2c4dbc7/fonc-14-1428498-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb01/11323743/d3468b09e825/fonc-14-1428498-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb01/11323743/1bab47bbfc0a/fonc-14-1428498-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb01/11323743/6e2cdf6d42c0/fonc-14-1428498-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Prospective comparison of Ga-DOTA-ibandronate and bone scans for detecting bone metastases in breast cancer.镓-多柔比星-伊班膦酸盐与骨扫描用于检测乳腺癌骨转移的前瞻性比较
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 31;14:1428498. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1428498. eCollection 2024.
2
Safety and Efficacy of 68 Ga- or 177 Lu-Labeled DOTA-IBA as a Novel Theranostic Radiopharmaceutical for Bone Metastases : A Phase 0/I Study.68Ga-或 177Lu 标记的 DOTA-IBA 作为一种新型骨转移治疗放射性药物的安全性和疗效:一项 0/I 期研究。
Clin Nucl Med. 2023 Jun 1;48(6):489-496. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004634. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
3
Potential utility of [Ga]DOTA-FAPI-04 as a broad-spectrum benign disease imaging agent-comparison with [F]FDG and [Tc]MDP.[镓]DOTA-FAPI-04作为一种广谱良性疾病显像剂的潜在效用——与[氟]FDG和[锝]MDP的比较
Eur Radiol. 2023 Dec;33(12):9378-9389. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09952-y. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
4
Comparison of the relative diagnostic performance of Ga-DOTA-IBA and F-NaF for the detection of bone metastasis.Ga-DOTA-IBA与F-NaF检测骨转移的相对诊断性能比较。
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 22;14:1364311. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1364311. eCollection 2024.
5
A prospective intra-individual comparison of [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, [Ga]Ga-NODAGA PET/CT, and [Tc]Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy for radionuclide imaging of prostate cancer skeletal metastases.一种前瞻性个体内比较研究:用于前列腺癌骨转移放射性核素成像的[Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT、[Ga]Ga-NODAGA PET/CT 和[Tc]Tc-MDP 骨闪烁显像。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Jan;48(1):134-142. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04867-y. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using F-PSMA PET/CT.使用F-PSMA PET/CT检测前列腺癌骨和软组织转移方面有更多优势。
Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;22(1):6-9. doi: 10.1967/s002449910952. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
7
The diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy for identifying bone metastases in persons with prostate cancer: A systematic review.镓-前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(Ga-PSMA PET/CT)与锝-亚甲基二膦酸盐骨闪烁显像(Tc-MDP)在前列腺癌患者骨转移诊断中的准确性:一项系统评价。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2023 Sep;54(3):545-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2023.04.005. Epub 2023 May 20.
8
Preparation, biological characterization and preliminary human imaging studies of Ga-DOTA-IBA.Ga-DOTA-IBA的制备、生物学特性及初步人体成像研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 14;12:1027792. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1027792. eCollection 2022.
9
Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET versus [Tc]Tc-MDP bone scan for diagnosing bone metastasis in prostate cancer: a head-to-head comparative meta-analysis.前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描与[锝]锝-亚甲基二膦酸盐骨扫描在诊断前列腺癌骨转移中的应用:一项直接比较的Meta分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 25;11:1451565. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1451565. eCollection 2024.
10
Ga-P15-041, A Novel Bone Imaging Agent for Diagnosis of Bone Metastases.Ga-P15-041,一种用于诊断骨转移的新型骨显像剂。
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 25;11:766851. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.766851. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of F-FDG and Ga-DOTA-IBA in detecting bone metastases: a lesion-basis study.18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖(F-FDG)与镓-多胺基多乙酸-异丁基双膦酸盐(Ga-DOTA-IBA)检测骨转移的比较:一项基于病灶的研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 14;15(1):12766. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97920-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the relative diagnostic performance of Ga-DOTA-IBA and F-NaF for the detection of bone metastasis.Ga-DOTA-IBA与F-NaF检测骨转移的相对诊断性能比较。
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 22;14:1364311. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1364311. eCollection 2024.
2
68 Ga-DOTA-IBA Uptake in Breast cancer.68Ga-DOTA-IBA 在乳腺癌中的摄取。
Clin Nucl Med. 2024 Jun 1;49(6):574-575. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005200. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
3
Women's Health Update: Growing Role of PET for Patients with Breast Cancer.女性健康新进展:正电子发射断层扫描在乳腺癌患者中的应用日益广泛。
Semin Nucl Med. 2024 Mar;54(2):247-255. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2024.01.007. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
4
Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: Bone Scan Versus PET Imaging.前列腺癌骨转移:骨扫描与PET成像
Semin Nucl Med. 2024 Jan;54(1):97-118. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
5
68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in Selected Breast Cancer Patients With Low FDG Affinity : A Head-to-Head Comparative Study.68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT 用于 FDG 亲和力低的特定乳腺癌患者:一项头对头对比研究。
Clin Nucl Med. 2023 Sep 1;48(9):e420-e430. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004751. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
6
Impact of F-Labeled Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Versus Conventional Staging in Patients With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描对局部晚期乳腺癌患者的影响与传统分期比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug 10;41(23):3909-3916. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00249. Epub 2023 May 26.
7
A New Radiopharmaceutical 225 Ac-DOTA-IBA in the Treatment of a Case of Bone Metastases.镥[177Lu]DOTATATE 治疗骨转移病例的一种新放射性药物 225Ac-DOTA-IBA。
Clin Nucl Med. 2023 Jul 1;48(7):650-652. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004688. Epub 2023 May 11.
8
Bone Metastases Detection in Patients with Breast Cancer: Does Bone Scintigraphy Add Information to PET/CT?乳腺癌患者骨转移检测:骨扫描对 PET/CT 有补充信息吗?
Oncologist. 2023 Aug 3;28(8):e600-e605. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad087.
9
Safety and Efficacy of 68 Ga- or 177 Lu-Labeled DOTA-IBA as a Novel Theranostic Radiopharmaceutical for Bone Metastases : A Phase 0/I Study.68Ga-或 177Lu 标记的 DOTA-IBA 作为一种新型骨转移治疗放射性药物的安全性和疗效:一项 0/I 期研究。
Clin Nucl Med. 2023 Jun 1;48(6):489-496. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004634. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
10
Harnessing imaging tools to guide immunotherapy trials: summary from the National Cancer Institute Cancer Imaging Steering Committee workshop.利用影像学工具指导免疫治疗试验:美国国家癌症研究所癌症影像学指导委员会研讨会总结。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Mar;24(3):e133-e143. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00742-2.