Suppr超能文献

症状性颅内动脉狭窄的支架置入术与单纯药物治疗:一项预先计划的汇总个体患者数据分析。

Stenting versus medical treatment alone for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis: a preplanned pooled individual patient data analysis.

作者信息

Wang Tao, Luo Jichang, Li Tianhua, Almallouhi Eyad, Gao Peng, Gong Haozhi, Zhang Xiao, Wang Jie, Lu Taoyuan, Yang Yifan, Yang Renjie, Xing Zixuan, Wang Haibo, Derdeyn Colin P, Jiao Liqun

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Neuro Interventional Surgery, Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Sarasota, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Jan 26. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-022189.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) is significantly different from that of medical treatment alone for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) is debatable. A study was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of both treatments for symptomatic ICAS.

METHODS

This preplanned pooled individual patient data analysis included 400 participants treated with PTAS and 409 treated with medical treatment alone in two large multicenter randomized clinical trials (SAMMPRIS and CASSISS). Patients were treated with PTAS using a self-expanding stent or medical treatment alone. The primary outcome was stroke or death within 30 days, or ischemic stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery more than 30 days after enrollment.

RESULTS

Individual data were obtained for 809 patients, 451 from SAMMPRIS and 358 from CASSISS. 400 participants were randomly assigned to the PTAS group and 409 to the medical group. The risk of the primary outcome was not significant between the PTAS and medical groups (17.5% vs 13.2%; HR 1.37 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.95), P=0.08). However, the risk of stroke or death within 30 days was higher in the PTAS group (10.5% vs 4.2%; HR 2.62 (95% CI 1.49 to 4.61), P<0.001). Patients of white ethnicity (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.31) and those with hyperlipidemia (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.26) or a transient ischemic attack (TIA) (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.45) were at higher risk for PTAS.

CONCLUSIONS

PTAS poses an increased risk of short-term stroke/death and therefore is not advised as primary treatment for symptomatic ICAS. A balance exists between stroke risks and revascularization benefits. For patients with asymptomatic ICAS of white ethnicity and those with hyperlipidemia or a history of TIA, a thorough assessment is warranted before considering PTAS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00576693, NCT01763320.

摘要

背景

经皮腔内血管成形术和支架置入术(PTAS)治疗有症状颅内动脉狭窄(ICAS)的安全性和有效性与单纯药物治疗相比是否存在显著差异,这一点存在争议。开展了一项研究以确定这两种治疗方法对有症状ICAS的安全性和有效性。

方法

这项预先计划的汇总个体患者数据分析纳入了两项大型多中心随机临床试验(SAMMPRIS和CASSISS)中接受PTAS治疗的400名参与者和单纯接受药物治疗的409名参与者。患者接受自膨式支架的PTAS治疗或单纯药物治疗。主要结局为30天内发生卒中或死亡,或入组后30天以上在责任动脉供血区域发生缺血性卒中。

结果

获取了809例患者的个体数据,其中451例来自SAMMPRIS,358例来自CASSISS。400名参与者被随机分配至PTAS组,409名被分配至药物组。PTAS组和药物组之间主要结局的风险无显著差异(17.5%对13.2%;风险比1.37(95%置信区间0.96至1.95),P = 0.08)。然而,PTAS组30天内发生卒中或死亡的风险更高(10.5%对4.2%;风险比2.62(95%置信区间1.49至4.61),P < 0.001)。白人种族患者(风险比1.97,95%置信区间1.17至3.31)以及患有高脂血症(风险比2.04,95%置信区间1.27至3.26)或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)(风险比2.19,95%置信区间1.08至4.45)的患者接受PTAS治疗的风险更高。

结论

PTAS会增加短期卒中/死亡风险,因此不建议将其作为有症状ICAS的主要治疗方法。卒中风险和血管再通益处之间存在平衡。对于白人种族的无症状ICAS患者以及患有高脂血症或有TIA病史的患者,在考虑PTAS之前有必要进行全面评估。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00576693,NCT01763320。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验