Department of Mechanical Engineering, QIS College of Engineering and Technology, Ongole 523272, India.
Solar Energy Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Vasavi Engineering College (A), Tadepalligudem, Andhra Pradesh 534101, India; Centre for Research in Advanced Fluid and Process, University Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Lebuhraya Tun Razak, Gambang, Kuantan 26300, Pahang, Malaysia; Faculty of Mechanical & Automotive Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia.
Water Sci Technol. 2024 Jun;89(12):3325-3343. doi: 10.2166/wst.2024.189. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
In this current investigation, the experimental performance of a solar still basin was significantly enhanced by incorporating snail shell biomaterials. The outcomes of the snail shell-augmented solar still basin (SSSS) are compared with those of a conventional solar still (CSS). The utilization of snail shells proved to facilitate the reduction of saline water and enhance its temperature, thereby improving the productivity of the SSSS. Cumulatively, the SSSS productivity was improved by 4.3% over CSS. Furthermore, the SSSS outperformed in energy and exergy efficiency of CSS by 4.5 and 3.5%, respectively. Economically, the cost per liter of distillate (CPL) for the CSS was 3.4% higher than SSSS. Moreover, the SSSS showed a shorter estimated payback period (PBP) of 141 days which was 6 days less than CSS. Considering the environmental impact, the observed CO emissions from the SSSS were approximately 14.6% higher than CSS over its 10-year lifespan. Notably, the SSSS exhibited a substantial increase in the estimated carbon credit earned (CCE) compared to the CSS. Ultimately, the research underscores the efficacy of incorporating snail shells into solar still basins as a commendable approach to organic waste management, offering economic benefits without compromising environmental considerations
在本研究中,通过引入蜗牛壳生物材料,显著提高了太阳能蒸馏器的实验性能。将蜗牛壳增强型太阳能蒸馏器(SSSS)的结果与传统太阳能蒸馏器(CSS)的结果进行了比较。蜗牛壳的使用有助于降低盐水的浓度并提高其温度,从而提高 SSSS 的产量。总的来说,SSSS 的产量比 CSS 提高了 4.3%。此外,SSSS 在太阳能蒸馏器的能量和火用效率方面分别比 CSS 提高了 4.5%和 3.5%。从经济角度来看,CSS 的每升蒸馏水成本(CPL)比 SSSS 高 3.4%。此外,SSSS 的预计投资回收期(PBP)比 CSS 短 6 天,为 141 天。考虑到环境影响,在其 10 年的使用寿命内,SSSS 的 CO 排放量比 CSS 高出约 14.6%。值得注意的是,与 CSS 相比,SSSS 的碳信用额(CCE)预计会大幅增加。最终,研究强调了将蜗牛壳纳入太阳能蒸馏器的方法是一种值得称赞的有机废物管理方法,在不影响环境考虑的情况下具有经济效益。