Mehta Hitaishi, Janaani P, Vinay Keshavamurthy, Bishnoi Anuradha, Parsad Davinder, Kumaran Muthu Sendhil
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2025 May-Jun;91(3):369-373. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_727_2023.
Background Cold urticaria (ColdU) is classified as a subtype of chronic inducible urticaria characterised by recurring pruritic wheals and/or angioedema upon exposure to cold stimuli. However, very limited data is available on ColdU specifically among Indians. Objectives The aim of this study was to describe the clinico-epidemiological characteristics and treatment response in North Indian patients diagnosed with ColdU. Methods The clinical records of patients diagnosed with ColdU past 5 years (January 2018 to December 2022) were retrospectively reviewed. Data including patient demographics, clinical manifestations, comorbidities, laboratory findings, and treatment response were collected and analysed. Results Among the 1780 urticaria patients included in our study, only 15 cases of cold-induced urticaria were identified. ColdU was classified as typical in all but three patients. The mean age of affected individuals was 36 ± 18 years (20-65 years) and eight patients (53.3%) were males. Mean disease duration at presentation was 18 ± 27 months (3 months-4 years). Two patients experienced cold-induced angioedema and one patient had hypotensive episodes following cold exposure. Twelve patients demonstrated positive results in the ice cube provocation test. Of 15, only 6 (40%) achieved complete control of symptoms with standard dosing of second generation anti-histamines while six patients (40%) required titration to higher doses and three patients (20%) were initiated on cyclosporine therapy, resulting in remission. Limitations Retrospective study design and possibility of selection bias. Conclusion Due to India's predominantly tropical climate, ColdU prevails at lower levels compared to the western regions. ColdU is likely underdiagnosed in India, possibly dismissed as chronic spontaneous urticaria. The management of ColdU involves a combination of protective measures against cold exposure and the use of anti-histamines to control disease activity. This retrospective study provides valuable insights into the clinico-epidemiological characteristics and treatment response of north Indian patients with ColdU.
寒冷性荨麻疹(ColdU)被归类为慢性诱发性荨麻疹的一种亚型,其特征是在接触冷刺激后反复出现瘙痒性风团和/或血管性水肿。然而,关于ColdU,尤其是印度人群中的相关数据非常有限。目的:本研究旨在描述北印度诊断为ColdU的患者的临床流行病学特征和治疗反应。方法:回顾性分析过去5年(2018年1月至2022年12月)诊断为ColdU的患者的临床记录。收集并分析包括患者人口统计学、临床表现、合并症、实验室检查结果和治疗反应等数据。结果:在我们纳入研究的1780例荨麻疹患者中,仅确诊15例寒冷性荨麻疹。除3例患者外,其余均被归类为典型ColdU。受影响个体的平均年龄为36±18岁(20 - 65岁),8例患者(53.3%)为男性。就诊时的平均病程为18±27个月(3个月 - 4年)。2例患者经历了冷诱导的血管性水肿,1例患者在冷暴露后出现低血压发作。12例患者在冰块激发试验中呈阳性结果。15例患者中,仅6例(40%)使用标准剂量的第二代抗组胺药实现了症状的完全控制,6例患者(40%)需要滴定至更高剂量,3例患者(20%)开始接受环孢素治疗并实现缓解。局限性:回顾性研究设计以及存在选择偏倚的可能性。结论:由于印度主要为热带气候,与西部地区相比,ColdU的患病率较低。ColdU在印度可能未得到充分诊断,可能被误诊为慢性自发性荨麻疹。ColdU的管理包括针对冷暴露的保护措施以及使用抗组胺药来控制疾病活动。这项回顾性研究为北印度ColdU患者的临床流行病学特征和治疗反应提供了有价值的见解。