• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索石棉改性特性的微生物多样性及其相互作用。

Exploring microbial diversity and interactions for asbestos modifying properties.

机构信息

Microbial Ecology Department, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 15;951:175577. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175577. Epub 2024 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175577
PMID:39155010
Abstract

Asbestos poses a substantial environmental health risk, and biological treatment offers a promising approach to mitigate its impact by altering its chemical composition. However, the dynamics of microbial co-inoculation in asbestos bioremediation remain poorly understood. This study investigates the effect of microbial single cultures and co-cultures on modifying crocidolite and chrysotile fibers, focusing on the extraction of iron and magnesium. Seventy bacterial and eighty-three fungal strains were isolated from five diverse sites, characterized phylogenetically using the 16S rRNA gene and ITS region, respectively, and assessed for siderophore and organic acid production. Most bacterial strains were identified as Pseudomonas, while Penicillium predominated among fungal strains. Ten bacterial and 25 fungal strains were found to produce both organic compounds. Four microbial co-cultures (one bacterium-bacterium, two fungus-bacterium, and one fungus-fungus) exhibiting synergistic effects in plate assays, alongside their respective single cultures, were incubated with crocidolite and chrysotile. ICP-OES analysis revealed that in crocidolite, the co-culture HRF19-HRB12 removed more iron than their single cultures, while Penicillium TPF36 showed the highest iron removal. The co-culture of two Pseudomonas strains (HRB12-RB5) exhibited the highest magnesium concentration in the supernatant. In chrysotile, the co-culture HRB12-RB5 removed more iron than their individual cultures, with Penicillium TFSF27 exhibiting the highest iron concentration in the solution. Penicillium TFSF27 and the co-culture TFSF27-TPF36 demonstrated the highest magnesium removal. SEM-XRMA analysis showed a significant reduction in iron and magnesium content, confirming elemental extraction from the fibers' structure. This study significantly broadens the range of microbial strains capable of modifying asbestos fibers and underscores the potential of microbial co-cultures in asbestos remediation.

摘要

石棉对环境健康构成重大威胁,而生物处理通过改变其化学成分提供了一种有前途的减轻其影响的方法。然而,微生物共接种在石棉生物修复中的动态仍知之甚少。本研究调查了微生物单一培养物和共培养物对改性青石棉和温石棉纤维的影响,重点是铁和镁的提取。从五个不同的地点分离了 70 株细菌和 83 株真菌,分别使用 16S rRNA 基因和 ITS 区进行系统发育特征描述,并评估其产生铁载体和有机酸的能力。大多数细菌菌株被鉴定为假单胞菌,而真菌菌株中则以青霉为主。发现 10 株细菌和 25 株真菌同时产生有机化合物。在平板试验中,四种微生物共培养物(一种细菌-细菌、两种真菌-细菌和一种真菌-真菌)表现出协同作用,以及它们各自的单一培养物,与青石棉和温石棉一起孵育。ICP-OES 分析表明,在青石棉中,共培养物 HRF19-HRB12 比其单一培养物去除更多的铁,而 Penicillium TPF36 表现出最高的铁去除率。两种假单胞菌(HRB12-RB5)的共培养物在超滤液中表现出最高的镁浓度。在温石棉中,共培养物 HRB12-RB5 比其各自的培养物去除更多的铁,而 Penicillium TFSF27 则在溶液中表现出最高的铁浓度。Penicillium TFSF27 和共培养物 TFSF27-TPF36 表现出最高的镁去除率。SEM-XRMA 分析表明,铁和镁含量显著降低,证实了从纤维结构中提取元素。本研究显著扩大了能够修饰石棉纤维的微生物菌株的范围,并强调了微生物共培养物在石棉修复中的潜力。

相似文献

1
Exploring microbial diversity and interactions for asbestos modifying properties.探索石棉改性特性的微生物多样性及其相互作用。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 15;951:175577. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175577. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
2
Siderophore-mediated iron removal from chrysotile: Implications for asbestos toxicity reduction and bioremediation. siderophore 介导的从温石棉中去除铁:对减少石棉毒性和生物修复的意义。
J Hazard Mater. 2018 Jan 5;341:290-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.033. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
3
Iron removal from raw asbestos by siderophores-producing Pseudomonas.利用产铁载体假单胞菌从生石棉中去除铁。
J Hazard Mater. 2020 Mar 5;385:121563. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121563. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
4
Soil fungi reduce the iron content and the DNA damaging effects of asbestos fibers.土壤真菌可降低石棉纤维的铁含量及其对DNA的破坏作用。
Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Sep 15;40(18):5793-8. doi: 10.1021/es060881v.
5
Inorganic materials and living organisms: surface modifications and fungal responses to various asbestos forms.无机材料与生物有机体:表面改性及真菌对各种石棉形态的反应
Chemistry. 2005 Sep 19;11(19):5611-8. doi: 10.1002/chem.200500046.
6
Microbe-Mineral Interactions between Asbestos and Thermophilic Chemolithoautotrophic Anaerobes.石棉与嗜热化能自养厌氧菌之间的微生物-矿物相互作用。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2023 Jun 28;89(6):e0204822. doi: 10.1128/aem.02048-22. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
7
Efficiency of pyoverdines in iron removal from flocking asbestos waste: An innovative bacterial bioremediation strategy.从 flock 石棉废物中去除铁的绿脓菌素的效率:一种创新的细菌生物修复策略。
J Hazard Mater. 2020 Jul 15;394:122532. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122532. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
8
Physical and biochemical interactions of soil fungi with asbestos fibers.土壤真菌与石棉纤维的物理和生化相互作用。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004 Apr;23(4):938-44. doi: 10.1897/03-266.
9
Weathering of chrysotile asbestos by the serpentine rock-inhabiting fungus Verticillium leptobactrum.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009 Jul;69(1):132-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00695.x. Epub 2009 Apr 27.
10
Internal Transcribed Spacer and 16S Amplicon Sequencing Identifies Microbial Species Associated with Asbestos in New Zealand.内转录间隔区和 16S 扩增子测序鉴定与新西兰石棉相关的微生物物种。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;14(3):729. doi: 10.3390/genes14030729.

引用本文的文献

1
Mosses in Urban Environments as Passive Biofilters and Organisms Impacted by Asbestos-Contaminated Habitats.城市环境中的苔藓作为被动生物过滤器以及受石棉污染栖息地影响的生物。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 26;22(6):838. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060838.
2
Examining the Environmental Ramifications of Asbestos Fiber Movement Through the Water-Soil Continuum: A Review.研究石棉纤维通过水土连续体移动的环境影响:综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 26;22(4):505. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040505.