• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青霉素过敏去标签化:针对患者及家属的风险分层工具的调整

Penicillin allergy de-labeling: Adaptation of risk stratification tool for patients and families.

作者信息

Horwitz Simonne L, Shen Ye, Erdle Stephanie C, Elwood Chelsea, Mak Raymond, Jacob John, Wong Tiffany

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Jul 23;17(8):100939. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100939. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100939
PMID:39156596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11324811/
Abstract

Penicillin allergy is reported in 10% of the population; however, over 90% of patients are deemed non-allergic upon allergist assessment. The goal of this quality improvement project is to validate a patient-driven assessment tool to safely identify patients at low risk of penicillin allergy and de-label them. Pediatric patients and pregnant women referred to the institution's allergy clinics for penicillin allergy assessment were invited to use the patient tool to complete a self-assessment, resulting in the assignment of a risk category. The risk stratification determined using the patient tool was compared against the allergist's assessment. The patient tool demonstrated agreement with the allergist assessment in 57/84 (67.9%, 95% CI [56.7%,77.4%]) assessments, intra-class correlation (ICC) = 0.618, p < 0.001. In 22/84 (26.2%) assessments, the patient tool determined a higher risk category, primarily due to differences in patients' perceived timing and description of symptoms. Only 5/84 (6.0%) patients were placed in a lower risk category by the patient tool compared to the allergist assessment. The patient tool demonstrates good validity in determining penicillin allergy risk, offering potential as a method of empowering patients to advocate in their care. Iterative changes to the patient tool will be applied to increase agreement.

摘要

据报告,10%的人群对青霉素过敏;然而,经过敏症专科医生评估,超过90%的患者被认为无过敏反应。本质量改进项目的目标是验证一种由患者驱动的评估工具,以安全地识别青霉素过敏低风险患者并去除其过敏标签。被转诊至该机构过敏诊所进行青霉素过敏评估的儿科患者和孕妇被邀请使用患者工具完成自我评估,从而确定风险类别。将使用患者工具确定的风险分层与过敏症专科医生的评估结果进行比较。在84次评估中的57次(67.9%,95%可信区间[56.7%,77.4%])中,患者工具与过敏症专科医生的评估结果一致,组内相关系数(ICC)=0.618,p<0.001。在84次评估中的22次(26.2%)中,患者工具确定的风险类别更高,主要是由于患者对症状出现时间和描述的认知存在差异。与过敏症专科医生的评估相比,患者工具仅将84名患者中的5名(6.0%)归为较低风险类别。患者工具在确定青霉素过敏风险方面显示出良好的有效性,具有让患者在其医疗护理中发挥自主作用的潜力。将对患者工具进行迭代修改以提高一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7872/11324811/08f4f0274c7b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7872/11324811/5434d660ae48/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7872/11324811/157e1334c0a2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7872/11324811/08f4f0274c7b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7872/11324811/5434d660ae48/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7872/11324811/157e1334c0a2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7872/11324811/08f4f0274c7b/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Penicillin allergy de-labeling: Adaptation of risk stratification tool for patients and families.青霉素过敏去标签化:针对患者及家属的风险分层工具的调整
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Jul 23;17(8):100939. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100939. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Reliability and validation of an electronic penicillin allergy risk-assessment tool in a pregnant population.电子青霉素过敏风险评估工具在孕妇群体中的可靠性与有效性验证
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024 Oct 19;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00918-3.
3
First pediatric electronic algorithm to stratify risk of penicillin allergy.首个用于分层青霉素过敏风险的儿科电子算法。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Dec 4;16(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-00501-6.
4
Virtually supported penicillin allergy de-labelling during COVID-19.2019年冠状病毒病期间几乎得到支持的青霉素过敏重新认定
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2023 Feb 27;19(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13223-023-00770-x.
5
True Rate of Allergy among Pediatric Inpatients with Penicillin Allergy Labels (TRIAL).青霉素过敏标签的儿科住院患者中过敏的真实发生率(试验)
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Jul 10;77(3):e3531. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.3531. eCollection 2024.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
A pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling project within a preoperative assessment clinic: the low-hanging fruit is within reach.药剂师主导的术前评估门诊青霉素过敏去标签项目:低挂的果实触手可及。
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Sep;139:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.06.012. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
8
Promoting penicillin allergy de-labeling for children attending a hematology clinic.促进儿科血液科就诊患儿青霉素过敏标识的去除。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2024 Jul;71(7):e31034. doi: 10.1002/pbc.31034. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
9
Implementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin and Cephalosporin Allergy Assessment Tool: A Pilot Evaluation.药师主导的青霉素和头孢菌素过敏评估工具的实施:一项试点评估。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2021;26(7):696-701. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-26.7.696. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
10
Penicillin Allergy…Maybe Not? The Military Relevance for Penicillin Testing and De-labeling.青霉素过敏……也许并非如此?青霉素检测与去标签化的军事意义。
Mil Med. 2019 Mar 1;184(3-4):e163-e168. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy194.

本文引用的文献

1
First pediatric electronic algorithm to stratify risk of penicillin allergy.首个用于分层青霉素过敏风险的儿科电子算法。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Dec 4;16(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-00501-6.
2
Practical guide for evaluation and management of beta-lactam allergy: position statement from the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.β-内酰胺类药物过敏评估与管理实用指南:加拿大过敏与临床免疫学会立场声明
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Nov 10;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-00494-2.
3
Risk of meticillin resistant and in patients with a documented penicillin allergy: population based matched cohort study.
有青霉素过敏史患者罹患耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和 感染的风险:基于人群的匹配队列研究。
BMJ. 2018 Jun 27;361:k2400. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2400.
4
Allergy Testing in Children With Low-Risk Penicillin Allergy Symptoms.对有低风险青霉素过敏症状儿童的过敏测试。
Pediatrics. 2017 Aug;140(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0471. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
5
The impact of penicillin allergy labels on antibiotic and health care use in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.青霉素过敏标签对基层医疗中抗生素使用及医疗保健的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Clin Transl Allergy. 2017 Jun 7;7:18. doi: 10.1186/s13601-017-0154-y. eCollection 2017.
6
Prevalence of beta-lactam allergy: a retrospective chart review of drug allergy assessment in a predominantly pediatric population.β-内酰胺类过敏的患病率:对以儿童为主的人群进行药物过敏评估的回顾性病历审查
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2016 Nov 29;12:59. doi: 10.1186/s13223-016-0165-6. eCollection 2016.
7
Assessing the Diagnostic Properties of a Graded Oral Provocation Challenge for the Diagnosis of Immediate and Nonimmediate Reactions to Amoxicillin in Children.评估分级口服激发试验诊断儿童阿莫西林即刻和迟发反应的诊断性能。
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Jun 6;170(6):e160033. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0033.
8
Drug allergies documented in electronic health records of a large healthcare system.电子健康记录中的药物过敏症。
Allergy. 2016 Sep;71(9):1305-13. doi: 10.1111/all.12881. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
9
Penicillin and beta-lactam allergy: epidemiology and diagnosis.青霉素和β-内酰胺类过敏:流行病学和诊断。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014 Nov;14(11):476. doi: 10.1007/s11882-014-0476-y.
10
Routine elective penicillin allergy skin testing in children and adolescents: study of sensitization.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1984 Jan;73(1 Pt 1):76-81. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(84)90487-1.