Auditory System Injury on the Battlefield-Solutions for Point-of-Injury and Prolonged Casualty Care: A DOTmLPF-P Analysis.

INTRODUCTION

"Good hearing" (DoDI 6030.03 6.5&6.6) is a combat multiplier, critical to service members' lethality and survivability on the battlefield. Exposure to an explosive blast or high-intensity continuous noise is common in operational settings with the potential to compromise both hearing and vestibular health and jeopardize safety and high-level mission performance. The Joint Trauma System Acoustic Trauma Clinical Practice Guideline was published in 2018, providing recommendations for the assessment and treatment of aural blast injuries and acoustic trauma in the forward deployed environment. Combat care capabilities responsive to current threat environments emphasize prolonged casualty care. Despite recommendations, auditory system health has not been assessed routinely or in its entirety on the battlefield. This is due primarily to the large footprint of an audiometric booth and to the heavy logistical burden of providing high-quality, comprehensive auditory system (including vestibular) examinations in the combat environment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Defense Health Agency Hearing Center of Excellence has completed a Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership & Education, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy (DOTmLPF-P) analysis of battlefield auditory system assessment and treatment, using 67 existing DoD documents and artifacts related to operational medicine.

RESULTS

Our analysis found that acoustic trauma is generally not addressed in any of the DOTmLPF-P domains. We recommend that auditory system assessment and treatment be incorporated across the continuum of care on the battlefield. This should be addressed through Prolonged Field Care and Tactical Combat Casualty Care guidance and in all Tactical Combat Casualty Care training programs. Equipment sets should be modified to include boothless technology and associated materiel for auditory system assessment. Policy and Doctrine changes would be required to mandate and support the implementation of these services. Uniformed audiologists should be added to the organizational structure at role 3 or higher to provide direct patient care; consult with other health care providers and commanders; develop and support enforcement of noise hazard guidelines; track hearing readiness; and, when necessary, provide specialized hearing protection devices that can compensate for hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations aim to help the DoD bring about necessary assessments and interventions for acoustic trauma so that service members can have better hearing outcomes and maintain critical auditory system function on the battlefield.