Peeters Stijn B, Hilgersom Merel, van Krugten Frédérique C W, Olaya Beatriz, Haro Josep M, Feltz-Cornelis Christina M van der, Hakkaart-van Roijen Leona
Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Research, Innovation and Teaching Unit, Universitat de Barcelona, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
J Ment Health. 2024 Aug 20:1-16. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2024.2390371.
Work-related mental health problems impose significant economic and personal burdens. eHealth interventions may offer low-cost, practical solutions, but guidance on their cost-effectiveness in workplace mental health is limited.
The objective of this study was to systematically review economic evaluations of workplace eHealth interventions for mental health, offering insights into methodologies and cost-effectiveness outcomes.
Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, searches were conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, PsycInfo and EconLit databases in May 2022, selecting peer-reviewed papers that performed economic evaluations on workplace eHealth interventions for adult mental health. Quality was assessed using the Drummond checklist.
From 3213 references, eight met the inclusion criteria. These studies varied in economic perspective, types of economic analysis type, primary outcome measures, intervention focus (e.g. stress, alcohol, insomnia & return-to-work) and direct non-medical costs. Five eHealth interventions were found to be cost-effective and/or have a positive return on investment, with seven studies rated as high quality according to the Drummond checklist.
The study outcomes unveiled the potential cost-effectiveness of eHealth interventions targeting mental health issues, particularly these focusing on workplace stress. However, generalization is challenging due to variations in the methodologies across studies.
与工作相关的心理健康问题带来了巨大的经济和个人负担。电子健康干预措施可能提供低成本、实用的解决方案,但关于其在工作场所心理健康方面成本效益的指导有限。
本研究的目的是系统回顾针对工作场所心理健康的电子健康干预措施的经济评估,深入了解方法和成本效益结果。
遵循PRISMA指南,于2022年5月在Embase、MEDLINE、科学网、谷歌学术、Cochrane图书馆、PsycInfo和EconLit数据库中进行检索,选择对针对成人心理健康的工作场所电子健康干预措施进行经济评估的同行评审论文。使用Drummond清单评估质量。
从3213篇参考文献中,有8篇符合纳入标准。这些研究在经济视角、经济分析类型、主要结局指标、干预重点(如压力、酒精、失眠和重返工作岗位)以及直接非医疗成本方面存在差异。发现五种电子健康干预措施具有成本效益和/或有正的投资回报,根据Drummond清单,七项研究被评为高质量。
研究结果揭示了针对心理健康问题的电子健康干预措施的潜在成本效益,特别是那些关注工作场所压力的措施。然而,由于各研究方法存在差异,进行推广具有挑战性。