Department of Breast Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No.8 East Street, Beijing, 100071, China.
Breast Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug 21;22(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03468-5.
TCbHP (taxane + carboplatin + trastuzumab + pertuzumab) is the preferred neoadjuvant therapy regimen for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, no consensus exists regarding whether specific populations may be exempt from carboplatin, allowing for de-escalation to the THP (taxane + trastuzumab + pertuzumab) regimen. Additionally, the optimal number of cycles for neoadjuvant THP remains unclear. We compared the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant TCbHP and THP regimens, providing clinicians with a nuanced perspective to guide their treatment regimen selection.
This multicenter real-world study included patients with HER2-positive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant TCbHP or THP between March 2019 and February 2023. Efficacy was assessed through the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, while safety was evaluated through monitoring adverse events.
Among 220 patients, 103 received 6 cycles of TCbHP (TCbHP×6), 83 received 6 cycles of THP (THP×6), and 34 received 4 cycles of THP (THP×4). The TCbHP×6 cohort exhibited a 66% pCR rate compared with 53% in the THP×6 cohort (P = 0.072). Subgroup analysis revealed that in patients aged ≤ 50 years, those with hormone receptor (HR)-negative status, and those with clinical stage T2, the pCR rate of the TCbHP×6 regimen was significantly higher than the THP×6 regimen (P < 0.05). The TCbHP×6 cohort reported higher frequencies of any-grade adverse events (99% versus 86.7%) and grade 3-4 events (49.5% versus 12%) than the THP×6 cohort. Propensity score matching identified 27 patient pairs between the THP×6 and THP×4 cohorts, indicating a significantly higher pCR rate for the THP×6 regimen than the THP×4 regimen (63% versus 29.6%, P = 0.029).
The TCbHP×6 regimen is favored for individuals aged ≤ 50 years and those aged > 50, ≤60 years with HR-negative status or clinical stage T2-4. For patients in compromised general condition or lacking the specified indications, the THP×6 regimen emerges as a lower-toxicity alternative with satisfactory efficacy. To ensure treatment efficacy, a minimum of 6 cycles of neoadjuvant THP is required.
TCbHP(紫杉烷+卡铂+曲妥珠单抗+帕妥珠单抗)是治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阳性乳腺癌的首选新辅助治疗方案。然而,对于是否可以免除特定人群的卡铂治疗,从而使治疗方案降级为 THP(紫杉烷+曲妥珠单抗+帕妥珠单抗),目前尚无共识。此外,新辅助 THP 的最佳周期数仍不清楚。我们比较了新辅助 TCbHP 和 THP 方案的疗效和安全性,为临床医生提供了一个细致的视角来指导他们的治疗方案选择。
这是一项多中心真实世界研究,纳入了 2019 年 3 月至 2023 年 2 月期间接受新辅助 TCbHP 或 THP 治疗的 HER2 阳性乳腺癌患者。通过病理完全缓解(pCR)率评估疗效,通过监测不良事件评估安全性。
在 220 名患者中,103 名患者接受了 6 个周期的 TcbHP(TCbHP×6)治疗,83 名患者接受了 6 个周期的 THP(THP×6)治疗,34 名患者接受了 4 个周期的 THP(THP×4)治疗。TCbHP×6 组的 pCR 率为 66%,而 THP×6 组为 53%(P=0.072)。亚组分析显示,在年龄≤50 岁、激素受体(HR)阴性和临床分期 T2 的患者中,TCbHP×6 方案的 pCR 率明显高于 THP×6 方案(P<0.05)。TCbHP×6 组任何级别的不良事件发生率(99%对 86.7%)和 3-4 级事件发生率(49.5%对 12%)均高于 THP×6 组。倾向性评分匹配在 THP×6 和 THP×4 组中确定了 27 对患者,表明 THP×6 方案的 pCR 率显著高于 THP×4 方案(63%对 29.6%,P=0.029)。
TCbHP×6 方案适用于年龄≤50 岁和年龄>50 岁、≤60 岁、HR 阴性或临床分期 T2-4 的患者。对于一般情况较差或不具备特定适应证的患者,THP×6 方案是一种毒性较低但疗效满意的替代方案。为确保治疗效果,新辅助 THP 至少需要 6 个周期。