Asbrand Julia, Spirkl Nora, Reese Gerhard, Spangenberg Lina, Shibata Naomi, Dippel Nele
Institute of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology of Childhood and Adolescence Institute of Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2025 Jan;38(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2024.2388255. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
While the impact of climate change on mental health, especially in young people, has been acknowledged, underlying mechanisms of this relation remain elusive. Based on research on active coping, we explored effects of agency on anxiety and coping in an experimental design. We further examined the relation between mental health (i.e., psychopathology, depressiveness, trait anxiety), trait factors (i.e., climate distress, intolerance of uncertainty, trait coping), state anxiety and coping with climate distress. 244 participants (15-25 years) watched a climate anxiety inducing video, followed by an agency manipulation (high agency vs. low agency vs. control). Trait mental health, intolerance of uncertainty, and climate distress and coping were examined as predictors of state anxiety and coping. State anxiety decreased in the high agency and control conditions, but not in the low agency condition. High agency led to increased meaning-focused coping and low agency to decreased meaning- and problem-focused coping. Trait mental health, problem-focused, and meaning-focused coping strategies each predicted their respective state counterparts. Emotion-focused coping was further predicted by all trait measures. The findings suggest a risk of low agency communication due to the lack of arousal decrease and lack of using functional coping in young people.
虽然气候变化对心理健康的影响,尤其是对年轻人心理健康的影响已得到认可,但这种关系的潜在机制仍不清楚。基于对积极应对的研究,我们在一项实验设计中探讨了能动性对焦虑和应对方式的影响。我们进一步研究了心理健康(即精神病理学、抑郁、特质焦虑)、特质因素(即气候困扰、对不确定性的不耐受、特质应对方式)、状态焦虑与应对气候困扰之间的关系。244名参与者(年龄在15至25岁之间)观看了一段引发气候焦虑的视频,随后进行能动性操纵(高能动性组与低能动性组与对照组)。特质心理健康、对不确定性的不耐受、气候困扰及应对方式被作为状态焦虑和应对方式的预测因素进行研究。在高能动性组和对照组中,状态焦虑有所降低,但在低能动性组中没有。高能动性导致以意义为中心的应对方式增加,而低能动性则导致以意义和问题为中心的应对方式减少。特质心理健康、以问题为中心和以意义为中心的应对策略各自预测了相应的状态对应物。所有特质测量指标进一步预测了以情绪为中心的应对方式。研究结果表明,由于年轻人缺乏唤醒降低和缺乏使用功能性应对方式,存在低能动性沟通的风险。