Assessing robotic-assisted surgery versus open approach in penetrating Crohn's disease: advantages and outcomes in ileocolic resection.

INTRODUCTION

Penetrating Crohn's disease (CD) often necessitates surgical intervention, with the open approach traditionally favored. Robotic-assisted surgery offers potential benefits but remains understudied in this complex patient population. Additionally, the lack of standardized surgical complexity scoring in CD hinders research and comparisons.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with penetrating CD who underwent either robotic-assisted ileocolic resection (RICR) or open ileocolic resection (OICR) at our institution from January 2007 to December 2021. We assessed endpoints, including length of stay, complications, readmissions, reoperations, and other perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

RICR demonstrated safety outcomes comparable to OICR. Importantly, RICR patients experienced significantly reduced estimated blood loss (p < 0.0001), shorter hospital stays (median 4.5 days versus 6.9 days; p = 0.01), lower surgical site infection rates (0% versus 15.4%; p = 0.01), and decreased 30-day readmission rates (0% versus 15.4%; p = 0.01). Linear regression analysis revealed the need for additional strictureplasties (coefficient: 84.8; p = 0.008), colonic resections (coefficient: 41.7; p = 0.008), and estimated blood loss (coefficient: 0.07; p = 0.002) independently correlated with longer operative times).

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted surgery appears to be a safe and potentially beneficial alternative for the surgical management of penetrating CD, offering advantages in perioperative outcomes reducing length of stay, blood loss, surgical site infection rates, and readmission rates. Further validation with larger cohorts is warranted.