Suppr超能文献

应用扩散加权成像和动态对比增强磁共振成像诊断糖尿病足骨髓炎:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Diagnosing osteomyelitis in diabetic foot by diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2024 Nov;79(11):805-817. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.07.015. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE), for diagnosing osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A thorough search was carried out to identify suitable studies published up to September 2023. The quality of the studies involved was evaluated using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each imaging modality/method for each specific cut point were summarized. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was calculated using bivariate mixed effects models.

RESULTS

Five studies investigating 187 patients and 234 bone lesions with 110 diagnosed osteomyelitis were enrolled. Four studies used DWI (172 lesions), three studies used DCE techniques (140 lesions) and two studies presented results of conventional MRI (66 lesions). The sensitivity ranges using conventional MRI, DWI and DCE were 65%-100%, 65%-100% and 64%-100%, respectively. The specificity ranges were 50%-61%, 56%-95%, and 66%-93%, respectively. The SROC curve of DWI and DCE was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Combining DWI and DCE methods, alongside conventional MRI, can improve the reliability and accuracy of diabetic foot osteomyelitis diagnosis. However, the study recognizes result variability due to varying protocols and emphasizes the need for well-designed studies with standardized approaches. To optimize diagnostic performance, the study recommends considering low ADC values, Ktrans or rapid wash-in rate from DCE such as iAUC60, along with using large ROIs that cover the entire lesion while excluding normal bone marrow.

摘要

目的

评估扩散加权成像(DWI)和动态对比增强(DCE)在诊断糖尿病足骨髓炎中的诊断性能。

材料和方法

系统检索了截至 2023 年 9 月发表的相关研究。使用 QUADAS-2 质量评估工具评估研究质量。总结了每种影像学方法/技术在每个特定截断值下的诊断敏感性和特异性。使用双变量混合效应模型计算汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线。

结果

共纳入 5 项研究,涉及 187 例患者和 234 个骨病变,其中 110 例被诊断为骨髓炎。4 项研究使用 DWI(172 个病变),3 项研究使用 DCE 技术(140 个病变),2 项研究报告了常规 MRI 的结果(66 个病变)。常规 MRI、DWI 和 DCE 的敏感性范围分别为 65%-100%、65%-100%和 64%-100%,特异性范围分别为 50%-61%、56%-95%和 66%-93%。DWI 和 DCE 的 SROC 曲线分别为 0.89(95%CI,0.86-0.92)和 0.90(95%CI,0.87-0.92)。

结论

结合常规 MRI,DWI 和 DCE 方法可提高糖尿病足骨髓炎诊断的可靠性和准确性。但是,该研究认识到由于协议的不同,结果存在变异性,并强调需要采用标准化方法进行设计良好的研究。为了优化诊断性能,该研究建议考虑 DCE 中的低 ADC 值、Ktrans 或快速冲洗率(如 iAUC60),同时使用大 ROI 覆盖整个病变区域,排除正常骨髓。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验