Ma Zi-Yu, Sun Shen, Wu Shui-Cai, Lin Lan, Chen Yi-Xiong, Zhao Dong, Morgan Stephen P
Faculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, China, No. 100 Pingleyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100124, China.
Beijing Science and Technology Project Manager Management Corporation Ltd, Beijing, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 2;10(15):e35716. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35716. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
Capillary Refill Time (CRT) measurement has gained increasing attention in the field of sepsis and septic shock. Recognizing pressure as a fundamental determinant in CRT measurement is crucial for establishing a standardized CRT measurement procedure. In this preliminary study, we elucidated the optimal pressing strength for CRT measurement by analyzing the CRTs measured under varying pressures.
Seventeen healthy individuals were enlisted to undergo CRT tests on their fingertips at various pressure levels. The applied force was initiated at 0.5N and incrementally increased by 0.5N until it reached 10.5N. An integrated Photoplethysmography (PPG) device was employed to capture fluctuations in light intensity. The CRT was automatically derived from the PPG signals via a specialized algorithm. The study included correlation assessment and reliability evaluation. Box plot and Bland-Altman plot were used to visualize the impact of pressure levels on CRTs.
A dataset of 1414 CRTs across 21 pressures showed significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.0001), highlighting the impact of pressure on CRT. CRT values between 4.5N and 10.5N pressures varied less, with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.499 indicating moderate consistency. Notably, CRTs at 10N and 10.5N pressures revealed a high ICC of 0.790, suggesting strong agreement.
A pressure range of 4.5N-10.5N is recommended for stable CRT measurements, with 10.0N-10.5N providing optimal consistency and reliability.
毛细血管再充盈时间(CRT)测量在脓毒症和感染性休克领域日益受到关注。认识到压力是CRT测量的一个基本决定因素,对于建立标准化的CRT测量程序至关重要。在这项初步研究中,我们通过分析在不同压力下测量的CRT,阐明了CRT测量的最佳按压强度。
招募了17名健康个体,在其指尖进行不同压力水平的CRT测试。施加的力从0.5N开始,每次增加0.5N,直至达到10.5N。采用集成光电容积脉搏波描记法(PPG)设备采集光强度波动。通过专门算法从PPG信号中自动得出CRT。该研究包括相关性评估和可靠性评估。使用箱线图和布兰德-奥特曼图来直观显示压力水平对CRT的影响。
21种压力下的1414个CRT数据集显示出显著差异(Kruskal-Wallis检验,p < 0.0001),突出了压力对CRT的影响。4.5N至10.5N压力下的CRT值变化较小,组内相关系数(ICC)为0.499,表明一致性中等。值得注意的是,10N和10.5N压力下的CRT显示出较高的ICC为0.790,表明一致性较强。
建议在4.5N - 10.5N的压力范围内进行稳定的CRT测量,10.0N - 10.5N可提供最佳的一致性和可靠性。