Cardiovascular and Renal Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Dev Biol. 2024 Dec;516:167-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
When and why did variations in placental structure and function evolve? Such questions cannot be addressed without a reliable version of mammalian phylogeny. Twenty-five years ago, the mammalian tree was reshaped by molecular phylogenetics. Soon it was shown, in contrast to prevailing theories, that the common ancestor of placental mammals had invasive placentation. Subsequently, evolution of many other features of extraembryonic membranes was addressed. This endeavour stimulated research to fill gaps in our knowledge of placental morphology. Last year the mammalian tree was again revised based on a large set of genomic data. With that in mind, this review provides an update on placentation in the nineteen orders of placental mammals, incorporating much recent data. The principal features such as shape, interdigitation, the interhaemal barrier and the yolk sac are summarized in synoptic tables. The evolution of placental traits and its timing is then explored by reference to the revised mammalian tree. Examples are the early appearance of epitheliochorial placentation in the common ancestor of artiodactyls, perissodactyls, pangolins and carnivores (with reversion to invasive forms in the latter) and later refinements such as the binucleate trophoblast cells and placentomes of ruminants. In primates, the intervillous space gradually evolved from the more basic labyrinth whereas trophoblast invasion of the decidua was a late development in humans and great apes. Only seldom can we glimpse the "why" of placental evolution. The best examples concern placental hormones, including some striking examples of convergent evolution such as the chorionic gonadotropins of primates and equids. In concluding, I review current ideas about what drives placental evolution and identify significant gaps in our knowledge of placentation, including several relevant to the evolution of placentation in primates.
当且为何胎盘结构和功能会发生变异?如果没有可靠的哺乳动物系统发育版本,这些问题就无法得到解答。25 年前,分子系统发生学重塑了哺乳动物树。很快就表明,与流行的理论相反,胎盘哺乳动物的共同祖先具有侵袭性胎盘。随后,对胚胎外膜的许多其他特征的进化进行了研究。这项工作激发了研究,以填补我们对胎盘形态学知识的空白。去年,基于大量基因组数据,再次修订了哺乳动物树。考虑到这一点,本综述提供了对 19 个胎盘哺乳动物目中胎盘形成的更新,纳入了大量最新数据。主要特征,如形状、交织、血液屏障和卵黄囊,在概要表中进行了总结。然后,通过参考修订后的哺乳动物树,探讨了胎盘特征的进化及其时间。例如,在偶蹄目、奇蹄目、穿山甲和食肉目动物的共同祖先中,上皮绒毛膜胎盘形成的早期出现(在后者中又恢复为侵袭性形式)以及后来的改进,如反刍动物的双核滋养细胞和胎盘体。在灵长类动物中,绒毛间隙逐渐从更基本的迷路进化而来,而滋养层对蜕膜的侵袭是人类和大猿类的晚期发育。我们很少能看到胎盘进化的“为什么”。最好的例子涉及胎盘激素,包括一些惊人的趋同进化的例子,如灵长类动物和马属动物的绒毛膜促性腺激素。最后,我回顾了目前关于驱动胎盘进化的想法,并确定了我们对胎盘形成的知识的重大差距,包括与灵长类动物胎盘形成进化相关的几个差距。