Suppr超能文献

良性疾病子宫切除术后盆腔器官脱垂的风险:一项全国性队列研究。

Risk of pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy for benign conditions: A nationwide cohort study.

作者信息

Yuk Jin-Sung

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sanggye Paik Hospital, School of Medicine, Inje University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Maturitas. 2024 Nov;189:108090. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108090. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) after hysterectomy for benign conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

This nationwide retrospective cohort study, utilizing data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, compared women aged 40 to 59 who underwent benign hysterectomy between 2002 and 2011 (hysterectomy group) with those who had national medical examinations during the same period (nonhysterectomy group). The analysis used a 1:1 propensity score matching method adjusted for variables.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Incident POP.

RESULTS

The final sample of 32,984 participants (16,492 in each group) had a median age of 47 years [45-50] (p-value 0.305) and a median follow-up of 11.4 years [10-13.3] (p-value 0.189). The incidence of POP was 0.5 % in the nonhysterectomy group and 0.6 % in the hysterectomy group. Hysterectomy was associated with an increased risk of POP that required surgery or pessary use (hazard ratio [HR] 1.403, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.026-1.919). Subtotal hysterectomy was not associated with an increased risk of POP (HR 1.868, 95 % CI, 0.624-5.593), while total hysterectomy was associated with an increased risk (HR 1.633, 95 % CI, 1.083-2.46). Laparoscopic surgery was not associated with an increased risk of POP (HR 0.611, 95 % CI 0.311-1.202).

CONCLUSIONS

The study found that, overall, hysterectomy is linked to a higher risk of POP, but subtotal hysterectomy and laparoscopy are not associated with increased risk, while total hysterectomy is associated with a higher risk.

摘要

目的

评估因良性疾病行子宫切除术后盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的风险。

研究设计

这项全国性回顾性队列研究利用韩国国民健康保险服务数据库的数据,将2002年至2011年间接受良性子宫切除术的40至59岁女性(子宫切除组)与同期接受全国体检的女性(非子宫切除组)进行比较。分析采用1:1倾向评分匹配法对变量进行调整。

主要观察指标

新发POP。

结果

最终样本为32984名参与者(每组16492名),中位年龄为47岁[45 - 50岁](p值0.305),中位随访时间为11.4年[10 - 13.3年](p值0.189)。非子宫切除组POP发病率为0.5%,子宫切除组为0.6%。子宫切除术与需要手术或使用子宫托的POP风险增加相关(风险比[HR]1.403,95%置信区间[CI]1.026 - 1.919)。次全子宫切除术与POP风险增加无关(HR 1.868,95% CI,0.624 - 5.593),而全子宫切除术与风险增加相关(HR 1.633,95% CI,1.083 - 2.46)。腹腔镜手术与POP风险增加无关(HR 0.611,95% CI 0.311 - 1.202)。

结论

研究发现,总体而言,子宫切除术与较高的POP风险相关,但次全子宫切除术和腹腔镜手术与风险增加无关,而全子宫切除术与较高风险相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验