Suppr超能文献

术者利手和手术站位对初次全膝关节置换术放射学结果的影响。

The influence of the surgeon's handedness and standing position at the operating table on the radiological outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Ceynowa Hospital in Wejherowo, Jagalskiego 10, 84-200 Wejherowo, Poland.

Department of Orthopedics and Rheumoorthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Konarskiego 13, 05-400 Otwock, Poland.

出版信息

Knee. 2024 Oct;50:147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2024.08.002. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare radiological outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in mechanical alignment implant positioning in the coronal and sagittal planes depending on surgeons' handedness and their position at the operating table.

METHODS

A total number of 200 consecutive patients with idiopathic osteoarthritis and varus knees who underwent TKA were retrospectively included in this research. Patients were operated on by 4 surgeons (50 for each surgeon) selected according to their handedness and position at the operative table. Surgeon I (right-handed, standing at the operating table always on the right side); Surgeon II(left-handed, standing at the operating table always on the left side); Surgeon III (right-handed, standing at the operating table on the side of the operated limb); Surgeon IV (left-handed, standing at the operating table on the side of the operated limb).

RESULTS

Comparing postoperative radiological results statistically significant differences were calculated in the case of deviation from HKA angle (left TKA -1.5°; Interquartile Range [IQR] = -2.6-[-1] vs right TKA -3°; IQR = -4.5-[-2]; p = 0.01) for surgeon II and MPTA for surgeon IV (left TKA 0°; IQR = -1-0.5 vs right TKA 1°; IQR = 0-2; p < 0.01). Higher deviation from the mechanical alignment angles and implant positioning was revealed for a less convenient operation site for the surgeon.

CONCLUSION

We recommend that all surgeons performing TKAs from the less comfortable side should take great care in establishing the MPTA and HKA angles to avoid surgical errors in implant positioning and limb alignment.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较冠状面和矢状面机械对线假体位置的全膝关节置换术(TKA)的影像学结果,具体取决于外科医生的惯用手及其在手术台上的位置。

方法

本研究回顾性纳入了 200 例特发性骨关节炎合并膝内翻患者,均接受 TKA。根据其惯用手及其在手术台上的位置选择 4 名外科医生(每位医生 50 例)进行手术。外科医生 I(右手,始终站在手术台右侧);外科医生 II(左手,始终站在手术台左侧);外科医生 III(右手,站在手术台手术肢体侧);外科医生 IV(左手,站在手术台手术肢体侧)。

结果

与术后影像学结果比较,统计学上发现外科医生 II 的 HKA 角偏差(左 TKA -1.5°;IQR=-2.6[-1] 与右 TKA -3°;IQR=-4.5[-2];p=0.01)和外科医生 IV 的 MPTA 存在显著差异(左 TKA 0°;IQR=-1-0.5 与右 TKA 1°;IQR=0-2;p<0.01)。对于手术操作不太方便的术侧,更容易出现机械对线角度和假体位置的偏差。

结论

我们建议所有从不太舒适侧进行 TKA 的外科医生在建立 MPTA 和 HKA 角度时应格外小心,以避免在假体定位和肢体对线方面出现手术误差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验