• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析影响创伤性肘僵硬老年患者肘关节松解术后关节活动度丧失的因素。

Analysis of Factors Affecting Range of Motion Loss after Elbow Joint Release Surgery in Elderly Patients with Traumatic Elbow Stiffness.

机构信息

Trauma Orthopedics Department, Hanzhong Central Hospital, 723000 Hanzhong, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Ann Ital Chir. 2024;95(4):575-582. doi: 10.62713/aic.3576.

DOI:10.62713/aic.3576
PMID:39186330
Abstract

AIM

Elbow joint release surgery is commonly used to treat elbow joint stiffness. Though it can restore elbow joint mobility, some patients may still experience range of motion (ROM) loss after surgery. Therefore, this study aims to explore the factors influencing ROM loss after elbow joint release surgery in elderly patients with traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 122 elderly patients with traumatic elbow stiffness who underwent elbow joint release surgery at Hanzhong Central Hospital from January 2023 to April 2024. The patients with range of motion loss were included in the observation group (n = 41), and those without range of motion loss were placed in the control group (n = 81). The general data of the two groups were compared, and Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors influencing the loss of ROM after elbow joint release surgery in elderly patients with traumatic elbow stiffness. A risk prediction model was also established based on the identified risk factors.

RESULTS

Multivariate Logistic regression analysis unveiled that high-energy injury (odds ratio (OR) = 4.632, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.363∼15.737), open injury (OR = 3.967, 95% CI = 1.308∼12.029), passive rehabilitation method (OR = 10.115, 95% CI = 1.113∼91.924), injury-to-release surgery time of ≥6 months (OR = 5.983, 95% CI = 1.677∼21.350), heterotopic ossification traumatic factors (OR = 5.409, 95% CI = 1.316∼22.224), and complex elbow joint damage (OR = 5.658, 95% CI = 1.457∼21.962) were all independent risk factors for ROM loss following elbow joint release surgery in elderly patients with traumatic elbow stiffness (p < 0.05). A risk prediction model was developed based on these factors, indicating a predictive sensitivity of 73.17%, a specificity of 69.14%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.767.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically, the independent risk factors identified in this study should be closely monitored. Furthermore, treatment should be tailored based on the specific conditions of the patient, and high-risk factors should be effectively controlled to reduce the risk of ROM loss after elbow joint release surgery in traumatic elbow joint stiffness elderly patients.

摘要

目的

肘部关节松解术常用于治疗肘部关节僵硬。虽然它可以恢复肘部关节的活动度,但一些患者在手术后仍可能出现活动度(ROM)丧失。因此,本研究旨在探讨影响创伤性肘部僵硬老年患者肘部关节松解术后 ROM 丧失的因素。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2023 年 1 月至 2024 年 4 月在汉中市中心医院接受肘部关节松解术的 122 例创伤性肘部僵硬老年患者。将出现活动度丧失的患者纳入观察组(n=41),将未出现活动度丧失的患者纳入对照组(n=81)。比较两组的一般资料,采用 Logistic 回归分析识别影响创伤性肘部僵硬老年患者肘部关节松解术后 ROM 丧失的因素,并基于识别出的危险因素建立风险预测模型。

结果

多因素 Logistic 回归分析揭示,高能损伤(比值比(OR)=4.632,95%置信区间(CI)=1.36315.737)、开放性损伤(OR=3.967,95%CI=1.30812.029)、被动康复方法(OR=10.115,95%CI=1.11391.924)、损伤至松解手术时间≥6 个月(OR=5.983,95%CI=1.67721.350)、异位骨化创伤因素(OR=5.409,95%CI=1.31622.224)和复杂肘部关节损伤(OR=5.658,95%CI=1.45721.962)均为影响创伤性肘部僵硬老年患者肘部关节松解术后 ROM 丧失的独立危险因素(p<0.05)。基于这些因素建立了风险预测模型,提示其预测灵敏度为 73.17%,特异性为 69.14%,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.767。

结论

临床上,应密切监测本研究确定的独立危险因素。此外,应根据患者的具体情况进行治疗,并有效控制高危因素,以降低创伤性肘部僵硬老年患者肘部关节松解术后 ROM 丧失的风险。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Factors Affecting Range of Motion Loss after Elbow Joint Release Surgery in Elderly Patients with Traumatic Elbow Stiffness.分析影响创伤性肘僵硬老年患者肘关节松解术后关节活动度丧失的因素。
Ann Ital Chir. 2024;95(4):575-582. doi: 10.62713/aic.3576.
2
What Range of Motion and Functional Results Can Be Expected After Open Arthrolysis with Hinged External Fixation For Severe Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness?铰链式外固定器开放性关节松解术后严重创伤后肘僵硬的活动范围和功能结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Oct;477(10):2319-2328. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000726.
3
Heterotopic ossification of the elbow treated with surgical resection: risk factors, bony ankylosis, and complications.肘关节异位骨化的手术切除治疗:危险因素、骨性强直和并发症。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2269-75. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3591-0. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
4
Surgical treatment of elbow stiffness caused by post-traumatic heterotopic ossification.创伤后异位骨化导致的肘部僵硬的手术治疗。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Aug;22(8):1128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
5
Risk Factors of Elbow Stiffness After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of the Terrible Triad of the Elbow Joint.肘关节恐怖三联征切开复位内固定术后肘僵硬的危险因素
Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):530-536. doi: 10.1111/os.12879. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
6
[Retrospective study of 23 arthrolyses of the elbow for post-traumatic stiffness: result predicting factors].[23例创伤后肘关节僵硬关节松解术的回顾性研究:结果预测因素]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1999 Dec;85(8):823-7.
7
Surgical resection of heterotopic bone about the elbow: an institutional experience with traumatic and neurologic etiologies.肘部异位骨的手术切除:创伤性和神经性病因的机构经验
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 May;36(5):798-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.01.015. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
8
Clinically relevant heterotopic ossification after elbow fracture surgery: a risk factors study.肘关节骨折术后临床相关的异位骨化:一项危险因素研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Apr;101(2):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.10.021. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
9
What Factors Are Associated with Reoperation After Operative Treatment of Terrible Triad Injuries?哪些因素与三联征损伤手术后再次手术有关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jan 1;479(1):119-125. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001391.
10
Does an Internal Joint Stabilizer and Standardized Protocol Prevent Recurrent Instability in Complex Persistent Elbow Instability?内部关节稳定器和标准化方案是否能预防复杂持续性肘关节不稳定的复发不稳定?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jul 1;480(7):1354-1370. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002159. Epub 2022 Mar 10.