Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States.
J Neurophysiol. 2024 Oct 1;132(4):1142-1155. doi: 10.1152/jn.00474.2023. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and motor point stimulation (MPS) are noninvasive techniques used to induce muscle contraction, aiding motor function restoration in individuals with neurological disorders. Understanding sensory inputs from PNS and MPS is crucial for facilitating neuroplasticity and restoring impaired motor function. Although previous studies suggest that MPS could induce Ia-sensory inputs less than PNS, experimental evidence supporting this claim is insufficient. Here, we implemented a conditioning paradigm combining transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with PNS or MPS to investigate their Ia-sensory inputs. This paradigm induces postactivation depression of spinal reflexes associated with transient decreases in neurotransmitter release from Ia-afferent terminals, allowing us to examine the Ia-sensory input amount from PNS and MPS based on the depression degree. We hypothesized that MPS would induce less postactivation depression than PNS. Thirteen individuals underwent MPS and PNS on the soleus muscle as conditioning stimuli, with tSCS applied to the skin between the spinous processes (L1-L2) as test stimuli. PNS- and MPS-conditioned spinal reflexes were recorded at five interstimulus intervals (ISIs) and four intensities. Results revealed that all PNS conditioning showed significant decreases in spinal reflex amplitudes, indicating postactivation depression. Furthermore, PNS conditioning exhibited greater depression for shorter ISIs and higher conditioning intensities. In contrast, MPS conditioning demonstrated intensity-dependent depression, but without all-conditioning depression and clear ISI dependency as seen in PNS conditioning. In addition, PNS induced significantly greater depression than MPS across most conditions. Our findings provide experimental evidence supporting the conclusion that MPS activates Ia-sensory nerves less than PNS. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and motor point stimulation (MPS) induce neuroplasticity, but differences in their effects on Ia-sensory inputs are unclear. We investigated their Ia-sensory inputs using a conditioning paradigm with spinal reflexes. Results showed that PNS conditioning significantly inhibited spinal reflexes than MPS conditioning, indicating greater postactivation depression due to Ia-sensory nerve activation. These findings provide experimental evidence that MPS activates Ia-sensory nerves to a lesser extent than PNS, enhancing our understanding of neuroplasticity.
周围神经刺激(PNS)和运动点刺激(MPS)是用于诱导肌肉收缩的非侵入性技术,有助于恢复神经障碍个体的运动功能。了解 PNS 和 MPS 的感觉输入对于促进神经可塑性和恢复受损的运动功能至关重要。尽管先前的研究表明,MPS 引起的 Ia 感觉传入比 PNS 少,但支持这一说法的实验证据不足。在这里,我们实施了一种结合经皮脊髓刺激(tSCS)与 PNS 或 MPS 的条件反射范式,以研究它们的 Ia 感觉传入。这种范式会引起脊髓反射的后激活抑制,这与 Ia 传入末梢神经递质释放的短暂减少有关,使我们能够根据抑制程度来检查 PNS 和 MPS 的 Ia 感觉传入量。我们假设 MPS 引起的后激活抑制比 PNS 少。13 名个体在比目鱼肌上接受 MPS 和 PNS 作为条件刺激,在棘突(L1-L2)之间的皮肤上施加 tSCS 作为测试刺激。在五个刺激间隔(ISIs)和四个强度下记录 PNS 和 MPS 条件反射的脊髓反射幅度。结果表明,所有 PNS 条件反射均显示脊髓反射幅度显著降低,表明后激活抑制。此外,PNS 条件反射在较短的 ISI 和较高的条件强度下表现出更大的抑制。相比之下,MPS 条件反射表现出强度依赖性抑制,但与 PNS 条件反射不同,没有所有条件的抑制和清晰的 ISI 依赖性。此外,在大多数情况下,PNS 引起的抑制明显大于 MPS。我们的研究结果为 MPS 激活 Ia 感觉神经的程度低于 PNS 的结论提供了实验证据。周围神经刺激(PNS)和运动点刺激(MPS)可诱导神经可塑性,但它们对 Ia 感觉传入的影响存在差异尚不清楚。我们使用脊髓反射的条件反射范式研究了它们的 Ia 感觉传入。结果表明,与 MPS 条件反射相比,PNS 条件反射显著抑制了脊髓反射,这表明由于 Ia 感觉神经激活引起了更大的后激活抑制。这些发现提供了实验证据,表明 MPS 激活 Ia 感觉神经的程度低于 PNS,从而增强了我们对神经可塑性的理解。