McManus A T, McManus W F, Mason A D, Aitcheson A R, Pruitt B A
Arch Surg. 1985 Feb;120(2):217-23. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390260077011.
Renovation of an existing intensive care burn facility required closure for ten months. An interim eight-bed open intensive care ward (B) was established in a burn convalescence ward. The renovated unit (A) contained nine single-bed intensive care rooms and seven intermediate-level care beds in four rooms. Patients admitted to unit A were treated as a cohort. The first 25 admissions to unit A and the last 25 admissions to ward B meeting the inclusion criteria were compared. Microbial colonization was monitored by a fixed protocol of admission and multiple weekly sputum, wound, stool, and urine cultures. During intensive care, both cohorts exhibited the same incidence of gram-negative wound, sputum, and urine colonization. Occurrence of antibiotic-resistant organisms was the same. No evidence of bacterial cross-contamination was observed between A and B. A continuation of Providencia stuartii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (type 15) endemics occurred in B. The collected data demonstrate that the A cohort was colonized with new, similar but distinct gram-negative organisms and indicate that cohort separation may be a practical way of eliminating endemic resistant gram-negative organisms from burn units.
对现有的烧伤重症监护设施进行翻新需要关闭十个月。在一个烧伤康复病房设立了一个临时的八床开放式重症监护病房(B)。翻新后的单元(A)有九个单人床重症监护室和四个房间中的七张中级护理床位。入住A单元的患者作为一个队列进行治疗。比较了A单元的前25名入院患者和符合纳入标准的B病房的最后25名入院患者。通过固定的入院方案以及每周多次的痰液、伤口、粪便和尿液培养来监测微生物定植情况。在重症监护期间,两个队列革兰阴性菌伤口、痰液和尿液定植的发生率相同。耐抗生素生物体的出现情况相同。未观察到A和B之间存在细菌交叉污染的证据。B病房中斯氏普罗威登斯菌和铜绿假单胞菌(15型)地方病持续存在。收集的数据表明,A队列被新的、相似但不同的革兰阴性菌定植,并表明队列隔离可能是从烧伤病房消除地方性耐药革兰阴性菌的一种切实可行的方法。