Suppr超能文献

中小型肩袖撕裂肌腱修复与物理治疗对比分析的15年结果:对既往报告的简要随访

Fifteen-Year Results of a Comparative Analysis of Tendon Repair Versus Physiotherapy for Small-to-Medium-Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: A Concise Follow-up of Previous Reports.

作者信息

Moosmayer S, Lund G, Seljom U Sire, Haldorsen B, Svege I C, Hennig T, Pripp A H, Smith H J

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martina Hansen's Hospital, Gjettum, Norway.

Department of Physiotherapy, Martina Hansen's Hospital, Gjettum, Norway.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Oct 2;106(19):1785-1796. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00065. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The optimal treatment for small-to-medium-sized rotator cuff tears remains a topic of debate. While both tendon repair and physiotherapy have shown comparable short-term results, there are concerns about the long-term effectiveness of physiotherapy. In 2 previous reports presenting the 5 and 10-year results of this trial, significant and increasing differences were observed in favor of tendon repair. Further investigation of the unexplored time interval after 10 years is essential to fully understand the implications of our treatment approaches. A total of 103 patients with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear not exceeding 3 cm were randomly allocated to tendon repair or physiotherapy with optional secondary repair. Measurements of shoulder function were performed by a blinded assessor at 6 months and 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 years. The outcome of primary interest was the 15-year result for the Constant score. Secondary outcome measures included the self-report section of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score; the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey; assessments of pain, motion, and strength; and patient satisfaction. Tear-size increase in unrepaired tears was assessed by sonography. Statistical analysis was by mixed-model analysis for repeated measurements and by intention to treat. Eighty-three (81%) of 103 patients attended the 15-year follow-up. Fifteen of 51 patients in the physiotherapy group had crossed over to secondary surgery. Results from primary tendon repair were superior by a mean difference of 11.8 points for the Constant score (p = 0.001), 13.9 points for the ASES score (p < 0.001), 1.8 cm on a 10-cm visual analog scale for pain (p < 0.001), and 16.2° and 22.4°, respectively, for pain-free abduction and flexion (p = 0.04 and 0.001). On the SF-36, differences did not reach significance for any of the scoring scales. In 26 tears treated by physiotherapy only, the mean tear size had increased from 16.2 to 31.6 mm in the anterior-posterior direction. Long-term outcomes from primary tendon repair remained superior to physiotherapy up to 15 years of follow-up, supporting its use as the primary treatment for small-to-medium-sized rotator cuff tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

摘要

中小型肩袖撕裂的最佳治疗方法仍是一个有争议的话题。虽然肌腱修复和物理治疗在短期效果上相当,但人们对物理治疗的长期有效性存在担忧。在之前两份报告中呈现了该试验的5年和10年结果,结果显示肌腱修复明显更具优势且差异呈扩大趋势。对10年后未探索的时间间隔进行进一步研究,对于全面理解我们治疗方法的意义至关重要。总共103例全层肩袖撕裂不超过3厘米的患者被随机分配接受肌腱修复或物理治疗以及选择性二次修复。由一名不知情的评估者在6个月、1年、2年、5年、10年和15年时对肩部功能进行测量。主要关注的结果是15年时的Constant评分结果。次要结果指标包括美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)评分的自我报告部分;简短健康调查问卷36项版(SF - 36);疼痛、活动度和力量评估;以及患者满意度。通过超声检查评估未修复撕裂的撕裂尺寸增加情况。采用重复测量的混合模型分析和意向性分析进行统计分析。103例患者中有83例(81%)参加了15年随访。物理治疗组51例患者中有15例转而接受二次手术。初次肌腱修复的结果在Constant评分上平均高出11.8分(p = 0.001),在ASES评分上高出13.9分(p < 0.001),在10厘米视觉模拟疼痛量表上疼痛减轻1.8厘米(p < 0.001),无痛外展和屈曲分别增加16.2°和22.4°(p = 0.04和0.001)。在SF - 36上,各评分量表的差异均无统计学意义。在仅接受物理治疗的26例撕裂中,前后方向的平均撕裂尺寸从16.2毫米增加到了31.6毫米。在长达15年的随访中,初次肌腱修复的长期结果仍优于物理治疗,支持将其作为中小型肩袖撕裂的主要治疗方法。

证据级别

治疗性I级。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅作者须知。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6591/11594065/7c53a1767a16/jbjsam-106-1785-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验