• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经外科医生采用改良脑损伤指南以提高一级创伤中心创伤性脑损伤患者的周转率:一项回顾性观察研究。

Utilization of the Modified Brain Injury Guidelines by Neurosurgeons to Improve Traumatic Brain Injury Patient Throughput at a Level I Trauma Center: A Retrospective Observational Study.

作者信息

Sweeney Jared F, Nath Kartik, Field Nicholas C, Harland Tessa A, Adamo Matthew A

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2024 Nov;191:e227-e234. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.098. Epub 2024 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.098
PMID:39197704
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The modified Brain Injury Guidelines (mBIG) were developed to improve care of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed to assess if utilization of mBIG by neurosurgeons would improve TBI patient throughput at a Level I trauma center, particularly for patients meeting mBIG 1 criteria.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study at a Level I trauma center. The mBIG were adopted in November 2021. Outcome and safety data for patients ≥18 years old meeting mBIG 1 criteria treated 18 months before (pre-mBIG cohort) or after (post-mBIG cohort) implementation were compared. Patients meeting criteria for mBIG 2 or mBIG 3 classification were excluded. In contrast to mBIG, neurosurgery was involved in the care of all patients.

RESULTS

The study included 170 patients with traumatic brain injury (77 pre-mBIG, 93 post-mBIG). In the post-mBIG cohort, 53 patients (57%) were discharged from the emergency department after a period of observation versus 3 patients (4%) in the pre-mBIG cohort (P ≤ 0.01). Post-mBIG patients who were not discharged were most often admitted for care of other injuries (85%). Repeat neuroimaging was less frequent in post-mBIG patients (15% vs. 62%, P ≤ 0.01). No patients in either cohort needed operative neurosurgical interventions or medical therapy for intracranial hypertension or experienced neurological deterioration. No post-mBIG patients had radiographic injury progression. The rate of repeat emergency department presentation within 30 days was not different between cohorts (P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

The mBIG 1 criteria were safe and improved low-risk TBI patient throughput at a Level I trauma center. Neurosurgical involvement may be beneficial to the mBIG while still facilitating significant resource savings.

摘要

目的

制定改良脑损伤指南(mBIG)以改善创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的护理。本研究旨在评估神经外科医生使用mBIG是否会提高一级创伤中心TBI患者的周转率,特别是对于符合mBIG 1标准的患者。

方法

这是一项在一级创伤中心进行的回顾性观察研究。mBIG于2021年11月采用。比较了在实施前(mBIG前队列)或实施后(mBIG后队列)治疗的符合mBIG 1标准的≥18岁患者的结局和安全数据。排除符合mBIG 2或mBIG 3分类标准的患者。与mBIG不同的是,所有患者的护理都有神经外科参与。

结果

该研究纳入了170例创伤性脑损伤患者(mBIG前队列77例,mBIG后队列93例)。在mBIG后队列中,53例患者(57%)经过一段时间观察后从急诊科出院,而mBIG前队列中为3例患者(4%)(P≤0.01)。未出院的mBIG后患者最常因其他损伤的护理而入院(85%)。mBIG后患者重复神经影像学检查的频率较低(15%对62%,P≤0.01)。两个队列中均无患者需要进行神经外科手术干预或针对颅内高压的药物治疗,也没有患者出现神经功能恶化。mBIG后患者均无影像学损伤进展。队列之间30天内再次到急诊科就诊的发生率无差异(P = 0.14)。

结论

mBIG 1标准在一级创伤中心是安全的,并且提高了低风险TBI患者的周转率。神经外科参与可能对mBIG有益,同时仍有助于大幅节省资源。

相似文献

1
Utilization of the Modified Brain Injury Guidelines by Neurosurgeons to Improve Traumatic Brain Injury Patient Throughput at a Level I Trauma Center: A Retrospective Observational Study.神经外科医生采用改良脑损伤指南以提高一级创伤中心创伤性脑损伤患者的周转率:一项回顾性观察研究。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Nov;191:e227-e234. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.098. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
2
The modified Brain Injury Guidelines: safe, sensitive, but not yet specific.
J Neurosurg. 2025 Jul 4;143(4):999-1008. doi: 10.3171/2025.3.JNS242874. Print 2025 Oct 1.
3
Creating and validating a neurosurgical intervention rule-out tool for patients with mild traumatic brain injury and isolated subdural hematoma: a 5-year, six-center retrospective cohort study.创建并验证用于轻度创伤性脑损伤和单纯性硬膜下血肿患者的神经外科干预排除工具:一项为期5年的六中心回顾性队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2024 Oct 11;142(3):839-850. doi: 10.3171/2024.5.JNS232478. Print 2025 Mar 1.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion.输血阈值指导红细胞输血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.
6
PECARN prediction rule for cervical spine imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt trauma: a multicentre prospective observational study.PECARN 预测规则在儿童因钝器伤就诊于急诊时的颈椎成像:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 Jul;8(7):482-490. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00104-4. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
7
Debriefing interventions for the prevention of psychological trauma in women following childbirth.产后女性心理创伤预防的汇报干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 10;2015(4):CD007194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007194.pub2.
8
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.创伤后应激障碍及共病物质使用障碍的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2.
9
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
10
Electric Scooter-related Injuries Are Becoming More Frequent and Costly in Denver, CO.在科罗拉多州丹佛市,与电动滑板车相关的伤害正变得越来越频繁,且成本越来越高。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):318-326. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003212. Epub 2024 Aug 13.