文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

探讨不同社会经济群体的成年人的食品素养干预措施在改善食品素养行为和促进健康饮食方面的有效性-系统范围综述。

Examining the effectiveness of food literacy interventions in improving food literacy behavior and healthy eating among adults belonging to different socioeconomic groups- a systematic scoping review.

机构信息

Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 28;13(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02632-y.


DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02632-y
PMID:39198926
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11350956/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: In high-income countries, significant diet-related health inequalities exist between people of different socioeconomic backgrounds. Individuals who face socioeconomic challenges are less likely to meet dietary guidelines, leading to increased incidence and prevalence of morbidity and mortality associated with dietary risk factors. To promote healthy eating, strategies may focus on individual-level factors (e.g., knowledge, skills, and behavior) along with broader societal factors (e.g., social determinants of health). The concept of food literacy is considered an individual-level factor and has been framed as a skill set that individuals must possess to effectively navigate the complexities of the modern food system. Food literacy interventions can be a complementary but effective tool for encouraging healthy eating behavior among diverse populations, including those facing socioeconomic disadvantage. However, there is limited evidence to guide the design of food literacy intervention for vulnerable population groups. In the process of developing an ideal portfolio of solutions and strategies to promote food literacy and healthy eating for people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, this systematic scoping review aims to comprehensively examine the effects of food literacy interventions on promoting food literacy behavior and healthy eating in adults (18 years and above) from various socioeconomic groups (SEGs) in high-income countries. METHODS: The review includes both qualitative and quantitative papers obtained from academic databases, including MEDLINE (via EBSCOhost), Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. In addition to the electronic search, manual forward and backward citation searching will be conducted to identify additional relevant papers. Food literacy interventions will be evaluated across four domains: planning and management, selection, preparation, and consumption. Papers included in the review will be analyzed for process, impact, and outcome evaluation. The main outcome of a food literacy intervention is the modification in eating behavior, while the mechanism for this action will be through impact measure of food literacy behaviors. Implementation factors will be extracted for process evaluation. This review will also include a range of dietary behavior measures, such as diet quality index and dietary intake indicator. The screening process for all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data will be carried out by two reviewers independently. In case of any potential conflicts, they will be resolved through discussion. The quality of quantitative studies will be reviewed using the JBI critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. The "Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ)" will be used to report on the quality of qualitative papers. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TPNKU.

摘要

背景:在高收入国家,不同社会经济背景的人群之间存在着显著的与饮食相关的健康不平等现象。面临社会经济挑战的个体不太可能遵守饮食指南,这导致与饮食风险因素相关的发病率和患病率增加。为了促进健康饮食,策略可能侧重于个体层面的因素(例如知识、技能和行为)以及更广泛的社会层面因素(例如健康的社会决定因素)。食品素养的概念被认为是一个个体层面的因素,并被定义为个人在现代食品系统中有效应对复杂性所需具备的技能组合。食品素养干预可以是鼓励不同人群(包括面临社会经济劣势的人群)健康饮食行为的一种补充但有效的工具。然而,目前指导针对弱势群体设计食品素养干预措施的证据有限。在制定一个理想的综合解决方案和策略组合,以促进社会经济劣势人群的食品素养和健康饮食的过程中,本系统评价旨在全面研究食品素养干预措施对促进高收入国家不同社会经济群体(SEGs)成年人(18 岁及以上)的食品素养行为和健康饮食的影响。

方法:该评价包括从学术数据库中获得的定性和定量论文,包括 MEDLINE(通过 EBSCOhost)、Embase、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar。除了电子检索外,还将进行手动向前和向后引用搜索,以确定其他相关论文。食品素养干预措施将在四个方面进行评估:计划和管理、选择、准备和消费。纳入评价的论文将进行过程、影响和结果评价分析。食品素养干预的主要结果是饮食行为的改变,而这种行为的机制将是通过食品素养行为的影响衡量。将提取实施因素进行过程评价。本评价还将包括一系列饮食行为措施,如饮食质量指数和饮食摄入量指标。将由两名评审员独立对所有引文、全文文章和摘要数据进行筛选。如果存在任何潜在的分歧,将通过讨论解决。使用 JBI 分析性横断面研究的批判性评价检查表对定量研究的质量进行评价。将使用“定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ)”报告定性论文的质量。

系统评价注册:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TPNKU。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe9/11350956/c91872bf9bd5/13643_2024_2632_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe9/11350956/d7a0073c6dfe/13643_2024_2632_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe9/11350956/c91872bf9bd5/13643_2024_2632_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe9/11350956/d7a0073c6dfe/13643_2024_2632_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe9/11350956/c91872bf9bd5/13643_2024_2632_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Examining the effectiveness of food literacy interventions in improving food literacy behavior and healthy eating among adults belonging to different socioeconomic groups- a systematic scoping review.

Syst Rev. 2024-8-28

[2]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

[3]
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.

Med J Aust. 2020-12

[4]
School-based interventions for promoting food and nutrition literacy (FNLIT) in elementary school children: a systematic review protocol.

Syst Rev. 2020-4-22

[5]
Healthy eating interventions delivered in early childhood education and care settings for improving the diet of children aged six months to six years.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-8-22

[6]
Healthy eating interventions delivered in early childhood education and care settings for improving the diet of children aged six months to six years.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-6-12

[7]
What's technology cooking up? A systematic review of the use of technology in adolescent food literacy programs.

Appetite. 2018-2-19

[8]
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.

JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009

[9]
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.

JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009

[10]
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.

Early Hum Dev. 2020-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Editorial on Nutrition Education, Food Literacy, and Healthy Diets in Childhood and Adolescence.

Nutrients. 2024-11-28

本文引用的文献

[1]
Dietary Intake, Cost, and Affordability by Socioeconomic Group in Australia.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-12-17

[2]
The role of social determinants on unhealthy eating habits in an urban area in Mexico: A qualitative study in low-income mothers with a young child at home.

Appetite. 2022-2-1

[3]
Are We Closer to International Consensus on the Term 'Food Literacy'? A Systematic Scoping Review of Its Use in the Academic Literature (1998-2019).

Nutrients. 2021-6-10

[4]
Healthy eating strategies for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: a meta-ethnography.

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021-12

[5]
Association of a Single-Item Self-Rated Diet Construct With Diet Quality Measured With the Alternate Healthy Eating Index.

Front Nutr. 2021-5-5

[6]
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

Lancet. 2020-10-17

[7]
Perceptions about Healthy Eating and Emotional Factors Conditioning Eating Behaviour: A Study Involving Portugal, Brazil and Argentina.

Foods. 2020-9-4

[8]
Can addressing food literacy across the life cycle improve the health of vulnerable populations? A case study approach.

Health Promot J Austr. 2021-2

[9]
Traditional Self-Reported Dietary Instruments Are Prone to Inaccuracies and New Approaches Are Needed.

Front Nutr. 2020-7-3

[10]
The Role of a Food Literacy Intervention in Promoting Food Security and Food Literacy-OzHarvest's NEST Program.

Nutrients. 2020-7-23

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索