Suppr超能文献

纳入目标:为 LGBTQIA+ 青少年提供怎样的性教育?

Inclusion Goals: What Sex Education for LGBTQIA+ Adolescents?

作者信息

Eleuteri Stefano, Girardi Marta, Spadola Rossella, Todaro Elisabetta

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Sexology, 00198 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 10;11(8):966. doi: 10.3390/children11080966.

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization and the World Association for Sexual Health (WAS) Declaration of Sexual Rights, sex education aims to provide children and adolescents with comprehensive knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values, promoting equality and nondiscrimination while upholding freedom of thought and expression. However, current school curricula often focus on dichotomous sexual identity and hetero-cis-normative prevention strategies, neglecting the needs of gender minority (GM) and sexual minority (SM) youths. In family settings, discussions typically revolve around sexual risk reduction and basic contraception, omitting relational aspects and components of sexual identity such as orientations and gender expressions. This discrepancy highlights a gap between the official goals of sex education and its practical implementation, reflecting a cultural deficit in familial sex education. This study reviews the scientific literature on sexual health promotion interventions from 2015 to 2024 to identify inclusive approaches that enhance the participation of all youths, not just hetero-cis-normative individuals. The hypothesis is that most interventions primarily serve heterosexual and cisgender youths, indicating a need for more inclusive strategies to achieve better sexual health and educational outcomes. The study also suggests expanding curricula to align with recognized guidelines and the diverse needs of youth.

摘要

根据世界卫生组织和世界性健康协会(WAS)的性权利宣言,性教育旨在为儿童和青少年提供全面的知识、技能、态度和价值观,促进平等和非歧视,同时维护思想和表达自由。然而,当前的学校课程往往侧重于二元性身份和异性-顺性别规范的预防策略,忽视了性别少数群体(GM)和性少数群体(SM)青年的需求。在家庭环境中,讨论通常围绕降低性风险和基本避孕措施展开,忽略了性身份的关系层面以及性取向和性别表达等组成部分。这种差异凸显了性教育的官方目标与其实际实施之间的差距,反映出家庭性教育中的文化缺陷。本研究回顾了2015年至2024年关于性健康促进干预措施的科学文献,以确定能够提高所有青年(而不仅仅是异性-顺性别规范个体)参与度的包容性方法。假设是大多数干预措施主要服务于异性恋和顺性别青年,这表明需要更多包容性策略来实现更好的性健康和教育成果。该研究还建议扩展课程,使其与公认的指导方针以及青年的多样化需求保持一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff9d/11352361/3fff0ad1ef38/children-11-00966-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验