• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中右侧桡动脉入路与左侧桡动脉入路的对比分析:对无症状性脑缺血的影响。

Comparative Analysis of Right vs. Left Radial Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Impact on Silent Cerebral Ischemia.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Elbistan State Hospital, 46300 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, 55270 Samsun, Turkey.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 23;60(8):1193. doi: 10.3390/medicina60081193.

DOI:10.3390/medicina60081193
PMID:39202475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11356614/
Abstract

: Silent cerebral ischemia (SCI) is defined as a condition that can be detected by biochemical markers or cranial imaging methods but does not produce clinical symptom. This study aims both to compare the frequency of SCI in PCIs performed with right transradial access and left transradial access and to evaluate the influencing factors. : A prospective, single-center study included 197 patients undergoing PCI via transradial access between November 2020 and July 2022. The patients were categorized into right radial and left radial groups. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) values were measured and recorded before and 18 h after the procedure. A post-procedure NSE level higher than 20 ng/dL was defined as SCI. : SCI occurred in 60 of the 197 patients. NSE elevation was observed in 37.4% ( = 37) of the right radial group and in 23.5% ( = 23) of the left radial group ( = 0.032). Patients with SCI had higher rates of smoking ( = 0.043), presence of subclavian tortuosity ( = 0.027), and HbA1c ( = 0.031). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the level of EF (ejection fraction) (OR: 0.958 95% CI 0.920-0.998, = 0.039), right radial preference (OR: 2.104 95% CI 1.102-3.995 = 0.023), and smoking (OR: 2.088 95% CI 1.105-3.944, = 0.023) were observed as independent variables of NSE elevation. : Our findings suggest that PCI via right radial access poses a greater risk of SCI compared to left radial access. Anatomical considerations and technical challenges associated with right radial procedures and factors such as smoking and low ejection fraction contribute to this elevated risk.

摘要

无症状性脑缺血(SCI)是指可以通过生化标志物或颅成像方法检测到但不产生临床症状的一种情况。本研究旨在比较经右侧桡动脉入路和左侧桡动脉入路行 PCI 时 SCI 的发生率,并评估其影响因素。

一项前瞻性、单中心研究纳入了 2020 年 11 月至 2022 年 7 月期间行经桡动脉入路 PCI 的 197 例患者。将患者分为右侧桡动脉组和左侧桡动脉组。在操作前后测量并记录神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)值。术后 NSE 水平高于 20ng/dL 定义为 SCI。

197 例患者中,有 60 例发生 SCI。右侧桡动脉组中,NSE 升高的发生率为 37.4%(=37),左侧桡动脉组为 23.5%(=23)(=0.032)。发生 SCI 的患者吸烟率较高(=0.043),存在锁骨下迂曲(=0.027)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平较高(=0.031)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,EF(射血分数)水平(OR:0.958,95%CI 0.920-0.998,=0.039)、右侧桡动脉偏好(OR:2.104,95%CI 1.102-3.995,=0.023)和吸烟(OR:2.088,95%CI 1.105-3.944,=0.023)是 NSE 升高的独立变量。

我们的研究结果表明,与左侧桡动脉入路相比,经右侧桡动脉入路行 PCI 时 SCI 的风险更高。右侧桡动脉操作相关的解剖因素和技术挑战,以及吸烟和低射血分数等因素,导致了这种风险的增加。

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Right vs. Left Radial Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Impact on Silent Cerebral Ischemia.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中右侧桡动脉入路与左侧桡动脉入路的对比分析:对无症状性脑缺血的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 23;60(8):1193. doi: 10.3390/medicina60081193.
2
Silent cerebral infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions (CTO) and non-CTOs.慢性完全闭塞病变(CTO)和非CTO经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的无症状性脑梗死
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Nov;36(11):2107-2113. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01939-w. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
3
Usefulness of Neuron-Specific Enolase to Detect Silent Neuronal Ischemia After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.神经元特异性烯醇化酶在检测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无症状神经元缺血中的应用价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jun 15;117(12):1917-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.037. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
4
Comparison of Frequency of Silent Cerebral Infarction After Coronary Angiography and Stenting With Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approaches.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径冠状动脉造影及支架置入术后无症状性脑梗死发生率的比较
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 15;122(4):548-553. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.04.056. Epub 2018 May 11.
5
Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中经桡动脉入路失败的风险评分、原因和临床影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
6
Features and variations of a radial artery approach in southern Chinese populations and their clinical significance in percutaneous coronary intervention.中国南方人群桡动脉入路的特点和变异及其在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的临床意义。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Mar;126(6):1046-52.
7
Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness Between Right Versus Left Radial Arterial Access in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中右桡动脉与左桡动脉穿刺入路的安全性和有效性比较
Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Jan;26(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.04.021. Epub 2016 May 25.
8
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径用于心源性休克患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:来自桡动脉优先中心的经验及已发表研究的荟萃分析
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Nov;108(11):563-75. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
9
Comparison of transradial coronary procedures via right radial versus left radial artery approach: A meta-analysis.经右侧桡动脉与左侧桡动脉途径进行桡动脉冠状动脉介入手术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec;88(7):1027-1033. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26519. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
10
Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.在接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,桡动脉与股动脉入路与对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤的相关性。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Dec;17(8):546-551. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Acceptance and safety of femoral versus radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): results from a large monitor-controlled German registry (QuIK).接受和安全的股动脉与桡动脉入路经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI):来自大型监测控制的德国登记处(QuIK)的结果。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Jan 12;22(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02283-0.
2
Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:一项更新的随机临床试验系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 1;97(7):1387-1396. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29486. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
Ischemic stroke, obesity, and the anti-inflammatory role of melatonin.缺血性脑卒中、肥胖与褪黑素的抗炎作用。
Biofactors. 2021 Jan;47(1):41-58. doi: 10.1002/biof.1690. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
4
Management of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complications: Algorithms From the 2018 and 2019 Seattle Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complications Conference.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发症的处理:2018 年和 2019 年西雅图经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发症会议的算法。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun;13(6):e008962. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.008962. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
5
Relation of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure to Silent Cerebral Infarcts in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者急性失代偿与无症状性脑梗死的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Jun 1;123(11):1835-1839. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.055. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
6
An Update on Radial Artery Access and Best Practices for Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.急性冠状动脉综合征经桡动脉入路和经桡动脉冠状动脉造影及介入治疗的最新进展:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e000035. doi: 10.1161/HCV.0000000000000035.
7
PCSK9: A novel inflammation modulator in atherosclerosis?PCSK9:动脉粥样硬化中的新型炎症调节剂?
J Cell Physiol. 2019 Mar;234(3):2345-2355. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27254. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
Neurovascular unit transport responses to ischemia and common coexisting conditions: smoking and diabetes.神经血管单位对缺血及常见共存病症(如吸烟和糖尿病)的转运反应。
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2019 Jan 1;316(1):C2-C15. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00187.2018. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
Comparison of Frequency of Silent Cerebral Infarction After Coronary Angiography and Stenting With Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approaches.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径冠状动脉造影及支架置入术后无症状性脑梗死发生率的比较
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 15;122(4):548-553. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.04.056. Epub 2018 May 11.
10
Comparison of Transradial and Transfemoral Approaches in Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China: A Retrospective Observational Study.中国接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的女性患者经桡动脉与经股动脉途径的比较:一项回顾性观察研究
Angiology. 2017 Oct;68(9):799-806. doi: 10.1177/0003319716685670. Epub 2017 Jan 5.