Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Aug 18;60(8):1342. doi: 10.3390/medicina60081342.
: The impact of anesthetic agents on memory and cognitive function following general anesthesia is of great interest, particularly regarding their effects on the developing pediatric brain. While numerous studies have examined the relationship between anesthetic drugs and brain function, research focusing on early cognitive function following sedation remains limited. : This study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving 148 pediatric patients scheduled for hematological procedures, specifically bone marrow aspiration (BMA) and intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC). Patients were divided into two groups based on the primary anesthetic used: the inhalational sedation group (IHG), in which sevoflurane was used, and the intravenous sedation group (IVG), which received propofol infusion. Apart from the main anesthetic agent, all sedation methods were consistent across both groups. A cognitive function test administered before sedation involved memorizing four distinct images, each associated with a different number. Then, the patients were asked to identify the omitted image upon awakening in the recovery room. Herein, this pre- vs. post-sedation test is called the early recognition assessment (ERA) tool. The primary outcome was the correct response rate after sedation for the two groups. Secondary outcomes included the sedation score, the behavior response score, and the correct response rates according to the number of sedation procedures. : This study included 130 patients in the final analysis, with 74 originally assigned to each group. The initial cognitive assessment revealed no significant difference in performance between the anesthetic agents. In addition, no differences were observed in the rates of correct responses or post-sedation scores after repeated procedures. However, the IVG demonstrated higher behavior response scores compared to the IHG. : There were no significant differences in the rates of correct responses using the ERA tool between the two groups, irrespective of the number of sedation procedures performed. While some differences were noted in preoperative, intraoperative, and post-anesthesia care, these did not significantly impact the cognitive outcomes measured.
全麻后麻醉药物对记忆和认知功能的影响备受关注,尤其是对发育中儿童大脑的影响。尽管许多研究已经探讨了麻醉药物与大脑功能之间的关系,但针对镇静后早期认知功能的研究仍然有限。
本研究为前瞻性、随机对照试验,纳入 148 例行血液学操作(骨髓穿刺术和鞘内化疗)的儿科患者。患者根据主要使用的麻醉药物分为两组:吸入镇静组(使用七氟醚)和静脉镇静组(输注丙泊酚)。除主要麻醉药物外,两组的所有镇静方法均相同。镇静前进行认知功能测试,要求患者记住四张不同的图片,每张图片对应一个不同的数字。然后,让患者在复苏室醒来后识别缺失的图片。在此,这种镇静前后的测试被称为早期识别评估(ERA)工具。主要结局是两组患者镇静后的正确反应率。次要结局包括镇静评分、行为反应评分,以及根据镇静次数的正确反应率。
本研究最终分析纳入 130 例患者,每组 74 例。初始认知评估显示,两组患者的麻醉药物使用性能无显著差异。此外,在重复操作后,正确反应率或镇静后评分也没有差异。然而,与吸入镇静组相比,静脉镇静组的行为反应评分更高。
无论进行了多少次镇静,两组患者使用 ERA 工具的正确反应率均无显著差异。尽管术前、术中以及麻醉后护理存在一些差异,但这些差异并未显著影响测量的认知结果。