Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital Madrid Puerta del Sur., Av. Carlos V, 70. 28938, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Madrid Puerta del Sur, Av. Carlos V, 70. 28938, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
Phys Med. 2024 Sep;125:104502. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104502. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
This study aims to evaluate the positioning correction extracted from Intra-fraction Cone Beam (IF-CBCT) images obtained during Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) treatments, and to assess whether its magnitude justifies its acquisition. In addition, the results obtained in lung, liver, and pancreas SBRTs with two deep inspiration breath-hold systems (DIBH), and for prostate with/without ultrasound (US) monitoring were compared.
1449 treatments, performed with two linear accelerators (LINACs) were retrospectively analyzed. DIBH were performed either with a spirometry-based device or a surface-guidance system and one LINAC was equipped with US monitoring system for prostate. Significance tests were used to account for differences between units.
Group systematic error (M) was approximately -0.7 mm for DIBH treatments in superior-inferior (SI) direction with no difference (p > 0.7) between LINACs. Moreover, there was a SI difference of 0.5 mm for prostate treatments (p = 0.008), in favor of the US monitored one. In anterior-posterior (AP) direction, only liver treatments exhibited differences between LINACs, with the spirometer-based system being 0.8 mm inferior (p = 0.003). M<0.4 mm in left-right (LR) direction was found for all locations and LINACs. The spirometer-based system resulted in lower standard deviation of systematic and random errors in most components and locations, with a greater effect observed in liver SBRTs.
The corrections made with IF-CBCT during SBRT treatments were not negligible. Both DIBH systems were effective in managing respiratory movements. However, the spirometry-based system was slightly more accurate. In addition, US monitoring of the prostate appeared to be useful in reducing target shift.
本研究旨在评估立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)过程中获取的分次内锥形束 CT(IF-CBCT)图像中的定位校正,并评估其幅度是否合理。此外,还比较了两种深吸气屏气系统(DIBH)在肺部、肝脏和胰腺 SBRT 以及前列腺有/无超声(US)监测中的结果。
回顾性分析了 1449 例采用两台直线加速器(LINAC)进行的治疗。DIBH 采用基于肺活量计的设备或表面引导系统进行,一台 LINAC 配备了前列腺 US 监测系统。采用显著性检验来解释两台 LINAC 之间的差异。
在 Superior-Inferior(SI)方向上,DIBH 治疗的系统误差(M)约为-0.7 毫米,两台 LINAC 之间无差异(p>0.7)。此外,前列腺治疗的 SI 差异为 0.5 毫米(p=0.008),有利于 US 监测的那台。在前-后(AP)方向上,只有肝脏治疗的 LINAC 之间存在差异,基于肺活量计的系统低 0.8 毫米(p=0.003)。所有部位和 LINAC 中,LR 方向的 M<0.4 毫米。基于肺活量计的系统在大多数部位和组件中产生的系统和随机误差的标准差较低,在肝脏 SBRT 中观察到的效果更大。
SBRT 治疗中使用 IF-CBCT 进行的校正并非微不足道。两种 DIBH 系统在管理呼吸运动方面都很有效。然而,基于肺活量计的系统稍微更准确。此外,前列腺的 US 监测似乎有助于减少靶区移位。