International Vaccine Institute, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
International Vaccine Institute, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA, USA; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA, USA.
J Infect. 2024 Oct;89(4):106260. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106260. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
Though observational evidence supports indirect effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, randomised experiments are lacking. To address this gap, the double-blinded, prospective follow-up of the household contacts (HHCs) of Philippine participants of the individually-randomised, placebo-controlled trial of the adjuvanted-subunit protein COVID-19 vaccine, SCB-2019, (EudraCT, 2020-004272-17; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04672395) was analyzed in a cluster-randomised fashion.
Over an eight-week period, HHCs were followed by rRT-PCR and paired rapid antibody tests (RATs) to detect symptomatic (SCI, primary) and all (ACI, secondary) SARS-CoV-2 infection. A standard analysis estimated the indirect effectiveness of SCB-2019 for each endpoint, excluding HHC RAT-positive at enrollment. A secondary analysis employed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results to correct for suspected bias.
SCB-2019 (N = 3470) and placebo (N = 3225) exposed HHCs contributed to at least one analysis. The standard analysis estimated that SCB-2019 reduced the risk of SCI by 83% (95% confidence/credible interval [CI: 32% to 96%), with no effect against ACI. The bias-corrected relative risk reduction was 97% (95% CI: 74% to 100%) for SCI and 79% (95% CI: 14% to 96%) for ACI, with an estimated one SARS-CoV-2 infection prevented per 4.8 households where one member received SCB-2019.
SCB-2019 demonstrated bias-corrected indirect effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection among HHC, even at a modest coverage level in the household (approximately 25%). Further research into the indirect effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is needed to optimize the impact of limited doses in low and middle-income settings.
尽管观察性证据支持 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的间接效果,但缺乏随机对照试验。为了解决这一差距,对菲律宾参与者的家庭接触者(HHC)进行了双盲、前瞻性随访,这些参与者参加了一项单独随机、安慰剂对照的 COVID-19 疫苗(SCB-2019)的临床试验,该疫苗为佐剂亚单位蛋白疫苗,试验方案编号为 EudraCT 2020-004272-17;临床试验.gov 注册号为 NCT04672395),采用集群随机化方式进行分析。
在八周的时间里,通过 rRT-PCR 和配对快速抗体检测(RAT)来检测有症状(SCI,主要终点)和所有(ACI,次要终点)SARS-CoV-2 感染的 HHC。标准分析估计了 SCB-2019 对每个终点的间接效果,排除了在入组时 RAT 阳性的 HHC。二次分析采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)结果来纠正可疑的偏差。
SCB-2019(N=3470)和安慰剂(N=3225)暴露的 HHC 至少对一项分析有贡献。标准分析估计,SCB-2019 降低了 83%的 SCI 风险(95%置信/可信区间[CI:32%至96%]),对 ACI 没有影响。经过偏倚校正后,SCI 的相对风险降低率为 97%(95%CI:74%至100%),ACI 的降低率为 79%(95%CI:14%至96%),估计每 4.8 个接受 SCB-2019 治疗的家庭中就有 1 人可以预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染。
SCB-2019 对 HHC 的 SARS-CoV-2 感染表现出经过偏倚校正的间接效果,即使在家庭中的覆盖率较低(约 25%)。需要进一步研究 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的间接效果,以优化在中低收入国家有限剂量的影响。