探索氧化锆粘结:预烧结和后烧结物理表面处理、化学处理和粘结剂相互作用。
Exploring Zirconia Adhesion: Pre and Postsintering Physical Surface Treatment, Chemical Treatment, and Cement Interactions.
机构信息
Faculdade de Odontologia Universidade Santo Amaro, Av. Prof. Eneas de Siqueira Neto, 340 04829-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Departamento de Biomateriais e Biologia Oral Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 2222 05508-000, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
出版信息
Biomed Res Int. 2024 Aug 22;2024:5394652. doi: 10.1155/2024/5394652. eCollection 2024.
Adhesion to zirconia remains a significant dental challenge. This study is aimed at assessing the bond strength of zirconia based on surface treatment with pre or postsintering sandblasting associated with different chemical treatments and resin cements. Zirconia blocks were divided into 12 experimental groups based on the surface treatment (presintering sandblasting or postsintering sandblasting/tribochemical abrasion treatment), chemical treatment (none, Single Bond Universal, or Signum Zirconia Bond), and choice of cement (Panavia F or RelyX™ U200). The bond strength was measured by shear tests using a universal testing machine. The fracture analysis was performed using stereomicroscopy. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test ( = 5%). Triple and double factor's interactions were not significant ( > 0.05). Regarding the surface treatment factor, the bond strength following postsintering sandblasting treatment associated with tribochemical abrasion (9.15 ± 3.62 MPa) was significantly higher than presintering sandblasting treatment (5.24 ± 3.53 MPa). Concerning the chemical treatment factor, bond strengths were ranked as follows: Signum Zirconia Bond > Single Bond Universal > no treatment. The bond strength of the resin cements did not differ among them. Most fractures (67%) were classified as adhesive, and 32% were categorized as mixed fractures. Surface treatment via postsintering sandblasting combined with tribochemical abrasion demonstrated superior efficacy than in presintering sandblasting. Additionally, chemical treatment with zirconia primer increased the bond strength of zirconia irrespective of the surface physical treatment.
氧化锆的黏附仍然是一个重大的牙科挑战。本研究旨在评估基于表面预处理的氧化锆黏结强度,预处理方法为预烧结喷砂或后烧结喷砂/机械化学研磨处理,同时还研究了不同化学处理和树脂水门汀的影响。将氧化锆块根据表面处理(预烧结喷砂或后烧结喷砂/机械化学研磨处理)、化学处理(无处理、Single Bond Universal 或 Signum Zirconia Bond)和黏结剂选择(Panavia F 或 RelyX™ U200)分为 12 个实验组。通过万能试验机进行剪切试验测量黏结强度。使用立体显微镜进行断裂分析。使用三因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验( = 5%)进行数据分析。三重和双因素相互作用不显著( > 0.05)。关于表面处理因素,后烧结喷砂联合机械化学研磨处理的黏结强度(9.15 ± 3.62 MPa)显著高于预烧结喷砂处理(5.24 ± 3.53 MPa)。关于化学处理因素,黏结强度的排序如下:Signum Zirconia Bond > Single Bond Universal > 无处理。树脂水门汀的黏结强度之间没有差异。大多数断裂(67%)为黏附性断裂,32%为混合性断裂。后烧结喷砂联合机械化学研磨处理的表面处理比预烧结喷砂处理效果更好。此外,氧化锆底涂剂的化学处理可增加氧化锆的黏结强度,而与表面物理处理无关。
相似文献
J Investig Clin Dent. 2015-11
Quintessence Int. 2013
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020-6
引用本文的文献
本文引用的文献
Biomed Res Int. 2022
BMC Oral Health. 2022-5-19
Restor Dent Endod. 2021-10-20
J Prosthodont Res. 2021-2-24
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2020
Biomater Investig Dent. 2020-3-30