Suppr超能文献

外科主动脉瓣置换术和经导管主动脉瓣植入术对心血管和脑血管控制的影响:一项初步研究。

Impact of surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular controls: A pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Department of Cardiothoracic, Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Physiol Rep. 2024 Sep;12(17):e70028. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70028.

Abstract

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are options in severe aortic valve stenosis (AVS). Cardiovascular (CV) and cerebrovascular (CBV) control markers, derived from variability of heart period, systolic arterial pressure, mean cerebral blood velocity and mean arterial pressure, were acquired in 19 AVS patients (age: 76.8 ± 3.1 yrs, eight males) scheduled for SAVR and in 19 AVS patients (age: 79.9 + 6.5 yrs, 11 males) scheduled for TAVI before (PRE) and after intervention (POST, <7 days). Left ventricular function was preserved in both groups. Patients were studied at supine resting (REST) and during active standing (STAND). We found that: (i) both SAVR and TAVI groups featured a weak pre-procedure CV control; (ii) TAVI ensured better CV control; (iii) cerebral autoregulation was working in PRE in both SAVR and TAVI groups; (iv) SAVR and TAVI had no impact on the CBV control; (v) regardless of group, CV and CBV control markers were not influenced by STAND in POST. Even though the post-procedure preservation of both CV and CBV controls in TAVI group might lead to privilege this procedure in patients at higher risk, the missing response to STAND suggests that this advantage could be insignificant.

摘要

外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)和经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AVS)的可选治疗方法。心血管(CV)和脑血管(CBV)控制标志物来源于心率、收缩压、大脑平均血流速度和平均动脉压的变异性,在 19 名计划接受 SAVR 的 AVS 患者(年龄:76.8±3.1 岁,8 名男性)和 19 名计划接受 TAVI 的 AVS 患者(年龄:79.9±6.5 岁,11 名男性)中获得,这些患者在介入前(PRE)和介入后(POST,<7 天)。两组患者的左心室功能均正常。患者在仰卧休息(REST)和主动站立(STAND)时接受检查。我们发现:(i)SAVR 和 TAVI 组在术前均存在较弱的 CV 控制;(ii)TAVI 可确保更好的 CV 控制;(iii)在 PRE 时,SAVR 和 TAVI 两组的脑自动调节功能均正常;(iv)SAVR 和 TAVI 对 CBV 控制没有影响;(v)无论组间如何,POST 中的 STAND 均不会影响 CV 和 CBV 控制标志物。尽管 TAVI 术后对 CV 和 CBV 控制的保留可能使高危患者更倾向于选择该手术,但对 STAND 无反应表明这种优势可能并不明显。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b7/11371460/e84e20943f7c/PHY2-12-e70028-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验