Suppr超能文献

一种新型聚四氟乙烯涂层自膨式金属支架治疗远端恶性胆管梗阻的疗效与安全性

Efficacy and safety of a novel polytetrafluoroethylene-coated self-expandable metal stent for distal malignant biliary obstruction.

作者信息

Nakagawa Hiroki, Takeda Tsuyoshi, Okamoto Takeshi, Hirai Tatsuki, Mie Takafumi, Furukawa Takaaki, Kasuga Akiyoshi, Sasaki Takashi, Ozaka Masato, Matsuda Takahisa, Igarashi Yoshinori, Sasahira Naoki

机构信息

Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan.

Department of Internal Medicine Omori Medical Center Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Toho University Tokyo Japan.

出版信息

DEN Open. 2024 Sep 3;5(1):e70010. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70010. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stent migration and sludge formation remain significant problems associated with covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs). The EGIS biliary stent fully covered flare type (EGIS biliary stent), a new type of polytetrafluoroethylene-coated self-expandable metal stent with low axial force and an anti-migration system, was developed to overcome these disadvantages. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this stent in comparison with conventional CSEMS (c-CSEMS).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who received initial CSEMS for distal malignant biliary obstruction. The primary outcome was time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO). Secondary outcomes included technical success rate, functional success rate, stent-related adverse events, causes of RBO, and re-intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were included (EGIS group: 20; c-CSEMS group: 20). The technical and functional success rates were similar between the two groups. Stent-related adverse event rates (20% vs. 15%, > 0.99) and overall RBO rates (56% vs. 50%, > 0.99) were not significantly different between the two groups. Stent migration was the most common cause of RBO in the EGIS group, while stent occlusion was in the c-CSEMS group. The median time to RBO (102 vs. 434 days, = 0.10) was not significantly different between the two groups. Endoscopic transpapillary re-intervention was successful in most patients in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The EGIS biliary stent was not associated with a longer time to RBO compared to c-CSEMS. Further improvements, especially against stent migration, are needed to improve its efficacy.

摘要

背景

支架迁移和胆泥形成仍然是与覆膜自膨式金属支架(CSEMS)相关的重大问题。EGIS胆道支架全覆膜喇叭口型(EGIS胆道支架)是一种新型的聚四氟乙烯涂层自膨式金属支架,具有低轴向力和抗迁移系统,旨在克服这些缺点。我们进行这项研究以评估该支架与传统CSEMS(c-CSEMS)相比的有效性和安全性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了因远端恶性胆管梗阻接受初始CSEMS治疗的不可切除胰腺癌连续患者。主要结局是复发性胆管梗阻(RBO)的时间。次要结局包括技术成功率、功能成功率、支架相关不良事件、RBO的原因和再次干预。

结果

共纳入40例患者(EGIS组:20例;c-CSEMS组:20例)。两组的技术和功能成功率相似。两组间支架相关不良事件发生率(20%对15%,>0.99)和总体RBO发生率(56%对50%,>0.99)无显著差异。在EGIS组中,支架迁移是RBO最常见的原因,而在c-CSEMS组中是支架闭塞。两组间RBO的中位时间(102天对434天,=0.10)无显著差异。两组中大多数患者的内镜乳头肌切开术再次干预均成功。

结论

与c-CSEMS相比,EGIS胆道支架与RBO时间延长无关。需要进一步改进,尤其是针对支架迁移,以提高其疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4cf/11369803/8df2b39d6399/DEO2-5-e70010-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验