Ellakany Passent, Madi Marwa, Elwan Amira H, Alshehri Turki, Aljubran Hussain, Aly Nourhan M
Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
J Prosthodont. 2024 Sep 4. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13933.
This systematic review aimed to provide comprehensive insights on the accuracy, fit, and mechanical characteristics of implant-supported computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) prostheses, with a focus on milled and 3D-printed approaches.
The research question focused on implant-supported dental prostheses, comparing different manufacturing techniques (conventional, milled, and 3D-printed) to determine the different factors affecting the mechanical properties and fit of the CAD-CAM implant-supported prosthesis. The eligibility criteria encompassed studies involving implant-supported restorations, clear reporting of manufacturing techniques, and English-language publications from the last decade. The search was conducted across three main databases, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science in September 2023. Publication details, study characteristics, and methodological details of each included study were described.
Of the initial 1964 articles, 581 met the inclusion criteria, and 104 studies were included in the final qualitative analysis. The majority of studies were conducted in the United States, Turkey, and Brazil. Fourteen studies evaluated accuracy parameters, while four studies focused on mechanical characteristics. The studies revealed variability in mechanical properties and marginal and internal fit, with fabrication methods impacting the structural integrity and stress distribution of the prostheses.
The findings suggest that digital manufacturing workflows, both milling and 3D printing, yield acceptable properties for implant-supported restorations with minimal variations in fit and accuracy. Notably, 3D printing and hybrid techniques demonstrate advantages in specific aspects like marginal fit and stress distribution. However, the milled prosthesis provided superior results in flexural strength and fracture resistance compared to conventional methods. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in clinical settings.
本系统评价旨在全面深入了解种植体支持的计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)修复体的准确性、贴合度和机械特性,重点关注铣削和3D打印方法。
研究问题聚焦于种植体支持的牙修复体,比较不同制造技术(传统、铣削和3D打印),以确定影响CAD-CAM种植体支持修复体机械性能和贴合度的不同因素。纳入标准包括涉及种植体支持修复体的研究、制造技术的清晰报告以及过去十年的英文出版物。2023年9月在三个主要数据库MEDLINE、Scopus和Web of Science中进行了检索。描述了每项纳入研究的出版细节、研究特征和方法学细节。
在最初的1964篇文章中,581篇符合纳入标准,104项研究纳入最终定性分析。大多数研究在美国、土耳其和巴西进行。14项研究评估了准确性参数,4项研究关注机械特性。研究揭示了机械性能、边缘和内部贴合度的变异性,制造方法影响修复体的结构完整性和应力分布。
研究结果表明,数字制造工作流程,包括铣削和3D打印,可为种植体支持的修复体提供可接受的性能,在贴合度和准确性方面变化最小。值得注意的是,3D打印和混合技术在边缘贴合度和应力分布等特定方面显示出优势。然而,与传统方法相比,铣削修复体在抗弯强度和抗断裂性方面提供了更好的结果。需要进一步研究在临床环境中证实这些发现。