• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优质预后的体外受精患者中,囊胚期移植与卵裂期胚胎移植对累积活产率的影响:多中心随机对照试验。

Effect of single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryo transfer on cumulative live births in women with good prognosis undergoing in vitro fertilization: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Clinical Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 5;15(1):7747. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52008-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-52008-y
PMID:39237545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11377718/
Abstract

In this multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized trial, we randomly assigned 992 women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with a good prognosis (aged 20-40, ≥3 transferrable cleavage-stage embryos) to strategies of blastocyst-stage (n = 497) or cleavage-stage (n = 495) single embryo transfer. Primary outcome was cumulative live-birth rate after up to three transfers. Secondary outcomes were cumulative live-births after all embryo transfers within 1 year of randomization, pregnancy outcomes, obstetric-perinatal complications, and livebirths outcomes. Live-birth rates were 74.8% in blastocyst-stage group versus 66.3% in cleavage-stage group (relative risk 1.13, 95%CI:1.04-1.22; P < 0.001, P = 0.003) (1-year cumulative live birth rates of 75.7% versus 68.9%). Blastocyst transfer increased the risk of spontaneous preterm birth (4.6% vs 2.0%; P = 0.02) and neonatal hospitalization >3 days. Among good prognosis women, a strategy of single blastocyst transfer increases cumulative live-birth rates over single cleavage-stage transfer. Blastocyst transfer resulted in higher preterm birth rates. This information should be used to counsel patients on their choice between cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage transfer (NCT03152643, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03152643 ).

摘要

在这项多中心、非劣效性、随机试验中,我们将 992 名预后良好(年龄 20-40 岁,≥3 个可转移的卵裂期胚胎)接受体外受精(IVF)的女性随机分为囊胚期(n=497)或卵裂期(n=495)单胚胎移植策略组。主要结局是最多进行 3 次移植后的累积活产率。次要结局是随机分组后 1 年内所有胚胎移植的累积活产率、妊娠结局、产科围产期并发症和活产结局。囊胚期组的活产率为 74.8%,卵裂期组为 66.3%(相对风险 1.13,95%CI:1.04-1.22;P<0.001,P=0.003)(1 年累积活产率为 75.7%比 68.9%)。囊胚移植增加了自发性早产(4.6%比 2.0%;P=0.02)和新生儿住院>3 天的风险。在预后良好的女性中,单囊胚移植策略比单卵裂期移植策略增加了累积活产率。囊胚移植导致早产率升高。这些信息应用于向患者提供关于卵裂期和囊胚期移植之间选择的咨询(NCT03152643,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03152643)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d38/11377718/091667d65a84/41467_2024_52008_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d38/11377718/08235ffeb99f/41467_2024_52008_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d38/11377718/091667d65a84/41467_2024_52008_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d38/11377718/08235ffeb99f/41467_2024_52008_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d38/11377718/091667d65a84/41467_2024_52008_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryo transfer on cumulative live births in women with good prognosis undergoing in vitro fertilization: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.优质预后的体外受精患者中,囊胚期移植与卵裂期胚胎移植对累积活产率的影响:多中心随机对照试验。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 5;15(1):7747. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52008-y.
2
Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.卵裂期胚胎与囊胚期胚胎在辅助生殖技术中的移植。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub6.
3
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.辅助生殖中卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub2.
4
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.辅助生殖中卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.
5
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.辅助生殖中卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub3.
6
Cumulative live birth rate of a blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer policy during in vitro fertilisation in women with a good prognosis: multicentre randomised controlled trial.体外受精时,针对预后良好的女性采用囊胚移植与卵裂期胚胎移植策略的累积活产率:多中心随机对照试验
BMJ. 2024 Sep 16;386:e080133. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080133.
7
Application of seminal plasma to female genital tract prior to embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology cycles (IVF, ICSI and frozen embryo transfer).在辅助生殖技术周期(体外受精、卵胞浆内单精子注射和冻融胚胎移植)中,于胚胎移植前将精浆应用于女性生殖道。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 28;2(2):CD011809. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011809.pub2.
8
Influence of cryopreservation on perinatal outcome after blastocyst- vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis.囊胚期与卵裂期胚胎移植后冻存对围产结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;51(1):54-63. doi: 10.1002/uog.18942.
9
Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射后移植的胚胎数量。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD003416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub2.
10
Non-inferiority of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in poor prognosis IVF patients (PRECiSE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在预后不良的 IVF 患者中,卵裂期胚胎与囊胚期胚胎移植的非劣效性比较(PRECiSE 试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2020 Jan 30;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-0870-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Nursing support for testicular sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with high paraplegia: a retrospective case series.高位截瘫患者睾丸精子抽吸和卵胞浆内单精子注射的护理支持:一项回顾性病例系列研究
Basic Clin Androl. 2025 Sep 2;35(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12610-025-00281-2.
2
Factors influencing the birth weight of ART-conceived offspring.影响辅助生殖技术受孕后代出生体重的因素。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03617-z.
3
Single frozen-thawed blastocyst derived from poor-grade Day 3 embryo is not associated with adverse neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Leukocyte telomere length in children born following blastocyst-stage embryo transfer.囊胚期胚胎移植后出生的儿童的白细胞端粒长度。
Nat Med. 2022 Dec;28(12):2646-2653. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02108-3. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
2
Women's preferences concerning IVF treatment: a discrete choice experiment with particular focus on embryo transfer policy.女性对体外受精治疗的偏好:一项特别关注胚胎移植政策的离散选择实验。
Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Jul 13;2022(3):hoac030. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac030. eCollection 2022.
3
ART in Europe, 2018: results generated from European registries by ESHRE.
来源于低级别第3天胚胎的单冻融囊胚与不良新生儿结局无关:一项回顾性队列研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Oct;312(4):1295-1307. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08122-3. Epub 2025 Jul 26.
4
A thinner endometrium is associated with a greater risk of preterm delivery after fresh cleavage embryo transfer but not after blastocyst transfer: a retrospective cohort study of 11,111 singleton live births.较薄的子宫内膜与新鲜卵裂期胚胎移植后早产风险增加有关,但与囊胚移植后无关:一项对11111例单胎活产的回顾性队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 30;16:1574123. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1574123. eCollection 2025.
5
The impact of hCG trigger versus dual trigger on reproductive outcomes in elderly infertile women: a retrospective cohort study.人绒毛膜促性腺激素扳机法与双重扳机法对高龄不孕女性生殖结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 28;16:1580610. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1580610. eCollection 2025.
2018年欧洲辅助生殖技术:欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会(ESHRE)基于欧洲登记处得出的结果
Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Jul 5;2022(3):hoac022. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac022. eCollection 2022.
4
Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.卵裂期胚胎与囊胚期胚胎在辅助生殖技术中的移植。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub6.
5
Blastocyst versus cleavage embryo transfer improves cumulative live birth rates, time and cost in oocyte recipients: a randomized controlled trial.囊胚与卵裂期胚胎移植在提高卵母细胞受者的累积活产率、时间和成本方面的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Jun;44(6):995-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2018.辅助生殖技术监测报告——美国,2018 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2022 Feb 18;71(4):1-19. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7104a1.
7
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies after blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared with those after cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis.与卵裂期胚胎移植后的单胎妊娠相比,囊胚期胚胎移植后的产科及围产期结局:一项系统评价与累积Meta分析
Hum Reprod Update. 2022 Feb 28;28(2):255-281. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmab042.
8
Live Birth with or without Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy.有无胚胎植入前遗传学检测非整倍体的活产。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 25;385(22):2047-2058. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103613.
9
Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification.体外受精后的累积活产率:随时间的趋势以及囊胚培养和玻璃化的影响。
Hum Reprod Open. 2021 Jun 29;2021(3):hoab021. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoab021. eCollection 2021.
10
Cumulative live birth rates following blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort study.囊胚期胚胎与卵裂期胚胎移植在体外受精第一周期中的累积活产率:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Oct 1;35(10):2365-2374. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa186.