Associate Professor, Department of Nephrology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India-603203.
Senior resident, Department of Nephrology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India-603203.
G Ital Nefrol. 2024 Aug 26;41(4):2024-vol4. doi: 10.69097/41-04-2024-12.
Cool dialysate has variable impact on hemodynamic stability and dialysis adequacy. Hemodynamic stability and dialysis adequacy are crucial indicators for better life expectancy and cardiovascular mortality. This research aims to evaluate the impact of cool dialysate temperature (35.5°C) compared to standard dialysate temperature (37°C) on blood pressures, pulse rate, and dialysis adequacy (Urea reduction ratio and online Kt/V) in a cross over design. Consenting ESRD patients on maintenance haemodialysis (HD) with minimum 3 months dialysis vintage and functioning permanent vascular access are included for the study. Each participant had two sessions of HD at 37°C followed by two sessions at 35.5° C on a Fresenius 4008S HD machine. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and Pulse rate are measured pre-HD, every hourly and post dialysis. Pre-HD Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and post-HD BUN are measured, and Urea reduction rate was calculated for each HD session. Kt/V was calculated by ionic conductance by HD machine for each session. 25 patients (5 females and 20 males) were enrolled. The mean age was 54 ± 9.58 years. Dialysis vintage was 21.48 ± 6.9 months for study participants 10 patients (40%) were diabetic nephropathy, 9 patients (36%) were presumed chronic glomerulonephritis, 2 patients (8%) were lupus nephritis and 4 patients (16%) were chronic interstitial nephritis. There was statistically no difference between pre-HD BUN (p = 0.330), post-HD BUN (p = 0.776), URR (p = 0.718) and Kt/V (p = 0.534) among the dialysis sessions done at 37°C and 35.5°C. SBP variability in the low temperature (35.5°C) group at 4th hour and post dialysis assumed statistical significance with p = 0.05 and p = 0.025 respectively. DBP variability in the low temperature (35.5°C) group at 3rd hour, 4th hour and post-dialysis demonstrated statistical significance with p = 0.027, p = 0.36 and p = 0.016 respectively. Pulse rate variability was more in the low temperature (35.5°C) group at 3rd hour and 4th hour which showed statistical significance with p = 0.037 and p = 0.05 respectively. Cool dialysate is non inferior to standard dialysate temperature in terms of dialysis adequacy and is associated with less variability in diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure and more pulse rate variability thereby contributing to better hemodynamic stability.
低温透析液对血液动力学稳定性和透析充分性有不同的影响。血液动力学稳定性和透析充分性是延长预期寿命和降低心血管死亡率的关键指标。本研究旨在通过交叉设计评估与标准透析液温度(37°C)相比,低温透析液(35.5°C)对血压、脉搏率和透析充分性(尿素降低率和在线 Kt/V)的影响。纳入接受维持性血液透析(HD)的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者,透析龄至少 3 个月,且功能正常的永久性血管通路。每位参与者在费森尤斯 4008S HD 机上进行两次 37°C 的 HD 治疗,随后进行两次 35.5°C 的 HD 治疗。在 HD 治疗前、每小时和治疗后测量收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和脉搏率。测量每次 HD 治疗前的血尿素氮(BUN)和治疗后的 BUN,并计算每个 HD 治疗的尿素降低率。每个治疗 session 通过 HD 机器的离子电导率计算 Kt/V。
共纳入 25 名患者(5 名女性和 20 名男性)。平均年龄为 54±9.58 岁。研究参与者的透析龄为 21.48±6.9 个月,10 名患者(40%)为糖尿病肾病,9 名患者(36%)为慢性肾小球肾炎,2 名患者(8%)为狼疮性肾炎,4 名患者(16%)为慢性间质性肾炎。在 37°C 和 35.5°C 进行的 HD 治疗中,透析前 BUN(p=0.330)、透析后 BUN(p=0.776)、URR(p=0.718)和 Kt/V(p=0.534)之间无统计学差异。低温(35.5°C)组的 SBP 变异性在第 4 小时和治疗后具有统计学意义,p 值分别为 0.05 和 0.025。低温(35.5°C)组的 DBP 变异性在第 3 小时、第 4 小时和治疗后具有统计学意义,p 值分别为 0.027、0.36 和 0.016。低温(35.5°C)组的脉搏率变异性在第 3 小时和第 4 小时更为明显,p 值分别为 0.037 和 0.05。
低温透析液在透析充分性方面并不逊于标准透析液温度,且与舒张压、收缩压变异性较小和脉搏率变异性较大有关,从而有助于更好的血液动力学稳定性。