Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚卫生和医学研究中关于收集、分析和报告性别信息的政策:一项混合方法研究。

Policies on the collection, analysis, and reporting of sex and gender in Australian health and medical research: a mixed methods study.

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.

Australian Human Rights Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2024 Oct 7;221(7):374-380. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52435. Epub 2024 Sep 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the policies of key organisations in Australian health and medical research on defining, collecting, analysing, and reporting data on sex and gender, and to identify barriers to and facilitators of developing and implementing such policies.

STUDY DESIGN

Mixed methods study: online planning forum; survey of organisations in Australian health and medical research, and internet search for policies defining, collecting, analysing, and reporting data by sex and gender in health and medical research.

SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Australia, 19 May 2021 (planning forum) to 12 December 2022 (final internet search).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relevant webpages and documents classified as dedicated organisation-specific sex and gender policies; policies, guidelines, or statements with broader aims, but including content that met the definition of a sex and gender policy; and references to external policies.

RESULTS

The online planning forum identified 65 relevant organisations in Australian health and medical research; twenty participated in the policy survey. Seven organisations reported at least one relevant policy, and six had plans to develop or implement such policies during the following two years. Barriers to and facilitators of policy development and implementation were identified in the areas of leadership, language and definitions, and knowledge skills and training. The internet search found that 57 of the 65 organisations had some form of sex and gender policy, including all ten peer-reviewed journals and five of ten research funders; twelve organisations, including eight peak body organisations, had published dedicated sex and gender policies on their websites.

CONCLUSION

Most of the organisations included in our study had policies regarding the integration of sex and gender in health and medical research. The implementation and evaluation of these policies is necessary to ensure that consideration of sex and gender is adequate during all stages of the research process.

摘要

目的

探索澳大利亚卫生和医学研究中主要组织在定义、收集、分析和报告性别数据方面的政策,并确定制定和实施这些政策的障碍和促进因素。

研究设计

混合方法研究:在线规划论坛;对澳大利亚卫生和医学研究组织的调查,以及互联网上搜索卫生和医学研究中定义、收集、分析和报告性别数据的政策。

设置、参与者:澳大利亚,2021 年 5 月 19 日(规划论坛)至 2022 年 12 月 12 日(最后一次互联网搜索)。

主要结果衡量标准

被归类为专门针对组织特定性别政策的相关网页和文件;具有更广泛目标的政策、指南或声明,但包括符合性别政策定义的内容;以及对外部政策的引用。

结果

在线规划论坛确定了澳大利亚卫生和医学研究中 65 个相关组织;20 个组织参加了政策调查。七个组织报告了至少一项相关政策,六个组织计划在未来两年内制定或实施此类政策。在领导力、语言和定义以及知识、技能和培训方面,确定了政策制定和实施的障碍和促进因素。互联网搜索发现,65 个组织中的 57 个组织制定了某种形式的性别政策,包括十份同行评议期刊中的全部和十家研究资助者中的五家;包括八个专业机构在内的 12 个组织在其网站上发布了专门的性别政策。

结论

我们研究中包含的大多数组织都有关于将性别纳入卫生和医学研究的政策。这些政策的实施和评估对于确保在研究过程的所有阶段都充分考虑性别问题是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验