Suppr超能文献

关于儿童运动障碍神经调节的患者教育材料的内容和可读性。

Content and readability of patient educational materials about neuromodulation for childhood movement disorders.

作者信息

Barnacoat Jamie M, Lewis Jennifer, Stewart Kirsty, Mohammad Shekeeb S, Paget Simon

机构信息

Kids Neuroscience Center, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.

Kids Rehab, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2025 May;47(10):2572-2578. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2397078. Epub 2024 Sep 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess content and readability of online patient educational materials (PEMs) for paediatric deep brain stimulation (DBS) and intrathecal baclofen (ITB).

METHODS

A content analysis of PEMs identified from top children's hospitals, institutions affiliated with published neuromodulation research, and DBS and ITB device manufacturers was conducted. PEM content was analysed using a predetermined framework. Readability was assessed using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG).

RESULTS

Of 109 PEMs (72 DBS; 37 ITB) identified, most (77 (71%)) originated in the United States. More ITB PEMs (27 (73%)) contained specific paediatric information than DBS PEMs (16 (22%)). PEMS more frequently described benefits (DBS: 92%; ITB: 89%) than risks (DBS: 49%; ITB: 78%). Frequent content included pre- and post-operative care, procedural details, and device information. Less common content included long-term lifestyle considerations, alternatives, patient experiences, and financial details. Median readability of PEMs was 13.2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 11.4-14.45) for DBS and 11.8 (IQR: 11-12.9) for ITB.

CONCLUSIONS

Available ITB and DBS PEMs often miss important broader details of the treatments, and have additional shortcomings such as poor readability scores. Our findings highlight need for more holistic content within neuromodulation PEMs, improved accessibility, and more balanced representation of risks and benefits.

摘要

目的

评估用于小儿深部脑刺激(DBS)和鞘内注射巴氯芬(ITB)的在线患者教育材料(PEM)的内容和可读性。

方法

对从顶级儿童医院、发表神经调节研究的附属机构以及DBS和ITB设备制造商中识别出的PEM进行内容分析。使用预定框架分析PEM内容。使用简化的晦涩难懂测量法(SMOG)评估可读性。

结果

在识别出的109份PEM中(72份DBS;37份ITB),大多数(77份(71%))源自美国。与DBS PEM(16份(22%))相比,更多的ITB PEM(27份(73%))包含特定的儿科信息。PEM更频繁地描述益处(DBS:92%;ITB:89%)而非风险(DBS:49%;ITB:78%)。常见内容包括术前和术后护理、程序细节以及设备信息。较少见的内容包括长期生活方式考量、替代方案、患者经历和财务细节。DBS的PEM中位数可读性为13.2(四分位间距[IQR]:11.4 - 14.45),ITB的为11.8(IQR:11 - 12.9)。

结论

现有的ITB和DBS PEM常常遗漏治疗的重要更广泛细节,并且存在诸如可读性分数低等其他缺点。我们的研究结果凸显了神经调节PEM需要更全面的内容、更高的可及性以及风险和益处更平衡的呈现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验