Desai Milind Y, Okushi Yuichiro, Wolski Kathy, Geske Jeffrey B, Owens Anjali, Saberi Sara, Wang Andrew, Cremer Paul C, Sherrid Mark, Lakdawala Neal K, Tower-Rader Albree, Fermin David, Naidu Srihari S, Lampl Kathy L, Sehnert Amy J, Nissen Steven E, Popovic Zoran B
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Mar;18(3):251-262. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
In severely symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the VALOR-HCM (A Study to Evaluate Mavacamten in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Who Are Eligible for Septal Reduction Therapy) trial showed that mavacamten reduced the eligibility for septal reduction therapy with sustained improvement in left ventricular outflow tract gradients. Mavacamten also resulted in favorable cardiac remodeling, including improvement in biomarkers (eg, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and troponin T). However, the impact of mavacamten on left atrial (LA) function is unknown.
The aim of this study was to assess serial changes in LA strain measures in patients enrolled in the VALOR-HCM trial.
VALOR-HCM included 112 symptomatic patients with obstructive HCM (mean age 60 years; 51% male). Patients assigned to receive mavacamten at baseline (n = 56) continued therapy for 56 weeks and those assigned to placebo transitioned to mavacamten (n = 52) from week 16 to week 56. Echocardiographic LA strain (reservoir, conduit, and contraction) was measured by using a vendor-neutral postprocessing software.
At baseline, the mean LA volume index (LAVI) and LA strain values (conduit, contraction, and reservoir) were 41.3 ± 16.5 mL/m, -11.8% ± 6.5%, -8.7% ± 5.0%, and 20.5% ± 8.7%, respectively (all worse than reported normal). LAVI significantly improved by -5.6 ± 9.7 mL/m from baseline to week 56 (P < 0.001). There was a significant (P < 0.05) improvement in absolute LA strain values from baseline to week 56 (conduit [-1.7% ± 6%], contraction [-1.2% ± 4.5%], and reservoir [2.8% ± 7.7%]). Patients originally receiving placebo had no differences in LA measurements up to week 16. There was no significant improvement in LA strain values (conduit [-0.9% ± 3.8%], contraction [-0.4% ± 3.4%], and reservoir [1.4% ± 6.1%]; all; P = not significant) from baseline to week 56 in patients with history of atrial fibrillation.
In VALOR-HCM, mavacamten resulted in an improvement in LAVI and LA strain at week 56, suggesting sustained favorable LA remodeling and improved function, except in the atrial fibrillation subgroup. Whether the advantageous LA remodeling associated with long-term treatment with mavacamten results in a favorable impact on the observed high burden of atrial tachyarrhythmias in HCM remains to be proven. (A Study to Evaluate Mavacamten in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Who Are Eligible for Septal Reduction Therapy [VALOR-HCM]; NCT04349072).
在有严重症状的梗阻性肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者中,VALOR-HCM(一项评估玛伐卡坦对符合间隔减容治疗条件的有症状梗阻性肥厚型心肌病成人患者疗效的研究)试验表明,玛伐卡坦降低了间隔减容治疗的必要性,同时左心室流出道梯度持续改善。玛伐卡坦还带来了有利的心脏重塑,包括生物标志物(如N端前B型利钠肽和肌钙蛋白T)的改善。然而,玛伐卡坦对左心房(LA)功能的影响尚不清楚。
本研究旨在评估VALOR-HCM试验中患者左心房应变测量值的系列变化。
VALOR-HCM纳入了112例有症状的梗阻性HCM患者(平均年龄60岁;51%为男性)。基线时分配接受玛伐卡坦治疗的患者(n = 56)持续治疗56周,而分配接受安慰剂治疗的患者在第16周过渡到玛伐卡坦治疗(n = 52),持续至第56周。使用通用的后处理软件测量超声心动图左心房应变(储存、管道和收缩)。
基线时,平均左心房容积指数(LAVI)和左心房应变值(管道、收缩和储存)分别为41.3±16.5 mL/m、-11.8%±6.5%、-8.7%±5.0%和20.5%±8.7%(均比报道的正常情况差)。从基线到第56周,LAVI显著改善,降低了-5.6±9.7 mL/m(P < 0.001)。从基线到第56周,左心房绝对应变值有显著改善(P < 0.05)(管道[-1.7%±6%]、收缩[-1.2%±4.5%]和储存[2.8%±7.7%])。最初接受安慰剂治疗的患者在第16周前左心房测量值无差异。有房颤病史的患者从基线到第56周左心房应变值无显著改善(管道[-0.9%±3.8%]、收缩[-0.4%±3.4%]和储存[1.4%±6.1%];均P =无显著性差异)。
在VALOR-HCM试验中,玛伐卡坦在第56周时使LAVI和左心房应变得到改善,提示左心房持续发生有利的重塑且功能改善,但房颤亚组除外。与玛伐卡坦长期治疗相关的有利左心房重塑是否会对HCM中观察到的高发性房性快速心律失常产生有利影响仍有待证实。(一项评估玛伐卡坦对符合间隔减容治疗条件的有症状梗阻性肥厚型心肌病成人患者疗效的研究[VALOR-HCM];NCT04349072)