Suppr超能文献

中风后中枢性疼痛的管理:系统评价与荟萃分析

Management of Central Poststroke Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Tamasauskas Arnas, Silva-Passadouro Barbara, Fallon Nicholas, Frank Bernhard, Laurinaviciute Svajune, Keller Simon, Marshall Andrew

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Leeds Institute of Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Pain. 2025 Jan;26:104666. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104666. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

Abstract

Central poststroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic pain condition prevalent in 8 to 35% of stroke patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide insight into the effectiveness of available pharmacological, physical, psychological, and neuromodulation interventions in reducing pain in CPSP patients (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022371835). Secondary outcomes included mood, sleep, global impression of change, and physical responses. Data extraction included participant demographics, stroke etiology, pain characteristics, pain reduction scores, and secondary outcome metrics. Forty-two original studies were included, with a total of 1,451 participants. No studies providing psychological therapy to CPSP patients were identified. Twelve studies met requirements for a random-effects meta-analyses that found pharmacological therapy to have a small effect on mean pain score (SMD = -.36, 96.0% confidence interval [-.68, -.03]), physical interventions did not show a significant effect (SMD = -.55 [-1.28, .18]), and neuromodulation treatments had a moderate effect (SMD = -.64 [-1.08, -.19]). Fourteen studies were included in proportional meta-analysis with pharmacological studies having a moderate effect (58.3% mean pain reduction [-36.51, -80.15]) and neuromodulation studies a small effect (31.1% mean pain reduction [-43.45, -18.76]). Sixteen studies were included in the narrative review, the findings from which largely supported meta-analysis results. Duloxetine, amitriptyline, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation had the most robust evidence for their effectiveness in alleviating CPSP-induced pain. Further multicenter placebo-controlled research is needed to ascertain the effectiveness of physical therapies, such as acupuncture and virtual reality, and invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation treatments. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a top-down and bottom-up overview of evidence for the effectiveness of different pharmacological, physical, and neuromodulation treatments of CPSP. This review could provide clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness and tolerability of different treatment types.

摘要

中风后中枢性疼痛(CPSP)是一种神经性疼痛疾病,在8%至35%的中风患者中普遍存在。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在深入了解现有药物、物理、心理和神经调节干预措施对减轻CPSP患者疼痛的有效性(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42022371835)。次要结局包括情绪、睡眠、整体变化印象和身体反应。数据提取包括参与者的人口统计学信息、中风病因、疼痛特征、疼痛减轻分数和次要结局指标。纳入了42项原始研究,共有1451名参与者。未发现为CPSP患者提供心理治疗的研究。12项研究符合随机效应荟萃分析的要求,结果发现药物治疗对平均疼痛评分有较小影响(标准化均数差[SMD]=-.36,96.0%置信区间[-.68,-.03]),物理干预未显示出显著效果(SMD=-.55[-1.28,.18]),神经调节治疗有中等效果(SMD=-.64[-1.08,-.19])。14项研究纳入了比例荟萃分析,其中药物研究有中等效果(平均疼痛减轻58.3%[-36.51,-80.15]),神经调节研究有较小效果(平均疼痛减轻31.1%[-43.45,-18.76])。16项研究纳入了叙述性综述,其结果在很大程度上支持了荟萃分析结果。度洛西汀、阿米替林和重复经颅磁刺激在减轻CPSP引起的疼痛方面有效性的证据最为充分。需要进一步开展多中心安慰剂对照研究,以确定物理治疗(如针灸和虚拟现实)以及有创和无创神经调节治疗的有效性。观点:本文对不同药物、物理和神经调节治疗CPSP有效性的证据进行了自上而下和自下而上的概述。本综述可为临床医生提供对不同治疗类型的有效性和耐受性的全面理解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验