Pierre Clémence, Le Guen Yannick, Giordanengo Caroline, Goter Thomas, Léna Hervé, Niel Clémence, De Chabot Gonzague, Tiercin Marie, Le Garff Gwenaelle, Zimmermann François, Le Cornu Quentin, Ricordel Charles
Pneumology Department, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
INSERM U1242 COSS, CLCC Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1807-1815. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-141. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
Pembrolizumab 400 mg every six weeks (Q6W) and nivolumab 480 mg every four weeks (Q4W) are used since 2020 and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This recommendation relied on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models. The objective of the IDEE (Immunothérapie Double dose Etendue: Experience bretonne) study is to determine the safety and efficacy of this treatment regimen in real life conditions.
We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentric study including 117 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received pembrolizumab Q6W or nivolumab Q4W between March 2020 and March 2021.
The median age was 67 years, 68% were men with predominantly lung adenocarcinoma. The median time to double-dose regimen failure (TDDF) was 9.2 months. The survival rate at 12 months was 79%. TDDF was not influenced by sex, line of treatment, pathologic subtypes or anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody. There was no correlation between TDDF and duration of prior exposition to immunotherapy before switching. Sixty-eight patients experienced double-dose treatment failure, 28% because of toxicity including five definitive discontinuations. Five grade ≥3 immune-adverse events were reported included two cases of pneumonitis, all responding to corticosteroid therapy.
Our multicentric cohort supports the feasibility of pembrolizumab Q6W and nivolumab Q4W for patients with advanced NSCLC. There is no warning signal regarding safety neither efficacy in our real-life data.
自2020年及新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行以来,帕博利珠单抗每六周400毫克(Q6W)和纳武利尤单抗每四周480毫克(Q4W)被应用。该推荐基于药代动力学和药效学模型。IDEE(双倍剂量免疫治疗范围:布列塔尼经验)研究的目的是确定这种治疗方案在实际生活条件下的安全性和有效性。
我们进行了一项观察性、回顾性、多中心研究,纳入了117例晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,这些患者在2020年3月至2021年3月期间接受了帕博利珠单抗Q6W或纳武利尤单抗Q4W治疗。
中位年龄为67岁,68%为男性,主要为肺腺癌。双倍剂量方案失败(TDDF)的中位时间为9.2个月。12个月时的生存率为79%。TDDF不受性别、治疗线数、病理亚型或抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)抗体的影响。在转换治疗前,TDDF与既往接受免疫治疗的持续时间之间无相关性。68例患者经历了双倍剂量治疗失败,28%是由于毒性,包括5例最终停药。报告了5例≥3级免疫不良事件,包括2例肺炎,均对皮质类固醇治疗有反应。
我们的多中心队列支持帕博利珠单抗Q6W和纳武利尤单抗Q4W用于晚期NSCLC患者的可行性。在我们的实际生活数据中,没有关于安全性和有效性的警示信号。