Wahbi Eisa, Achour Hassan, Alsayed Tolibah Yasser
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, P.O. Box 3062, Damascus, Syria.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
BDJ Open. 2024 Sep 12;10(1):73. doi: 10.1038/s41405-024-00256-x.
This study aims to assess the efficacy of bioceramic (BC) sealer when applied using the single cone technique (SCT), in comparison to AH Plus sealer applied with the cold lateral condensation technique (LCT), concerning their impact on the healing of large-sized periapical lesions in both untreated and retreatment cases.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 41 patients who had 60 permanent teeth in the maxillary incisors that were accompanied by large-sized periapical lesions. The included teeth were radiographed with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and divided equally into two groups according to the endodontic treatment statute (30 untreated previous cases and 30 retreated cases). Subsequently, teeth received uniform preparation, irrigation, and dressing procedures. Then each group was divided equally according to the used sealer (15 teeth obturated using AH plus sealer with LCT and 15 teeth obturated using BC sealer with SCT). All cases were followed up after 6 and 12 months with CBCT images. Subsequently, the change in periapical lesion diameter (PLD) was observed as an indicator to determine the treatment outcome score. One-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze the PLD changing and scoring the treatment outcome during the follow-up periods. The significance level was set at α = 0.05.
There were no statistically significant differences between untreated and retreatment cases neither using AH plus sealer with LCT nor BC sealer with SCT regarding changes in PLD in the follow-up periods. Moreover, there were no significant differences between groups regarding treatment outcome scores in the follow-up periods. All groups showed a high success rate.
Successful treatment was achieved for untreated or retreatment maxillary incisor cases accompanied by large-sized periapical lesions using either BC sealer with the SCT or AH Plus sealer with LCT with a similar high success rate up to 12 months follow-up period.
本研究旨在评估使用单锥技术(SCT)应用生物陶瓷(BC)封闭剂的疗效,与采用冷侧方加压技术(LCT)应用AH Plus封闭剂相比,观察它们对未经治疗和再治疗病例中大型根尖周病变愈合的影响。
对41例上颌切牙有60颗恒牙且伴有大型根尖周病变的患者进行了一项随机对照试验。纳入的牙齿用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)成像进行放射照相,并根据牙髓治疗情况平均分为两组(30例既往未治疗病例和30例再治疗病例)。随后,对牙齿进行统一的预备、冲洗和换药程序。然后根据所用封闭剂将每组再平均分为两组(15颗牙齿使用AH plus封闭剂和LCT进行根管充填,15颗牙齿使用BC封闭剂和SCT进行根管充填)。所有病例在6个月和12个月后用CBCT图像进行随访。随后,观察根尖周病变直径(PLD)的变化作为确定治疗结果评分的指标。采用单因素方差分析和曼-惠特尼U检验分析随访期间PLD的变化及治疗结果评分。显著性水平设定为α = 0.05。
在随访期间,无论是使用AH plus封闭剂和LCT还是使用BC封闭剂和SCT,未经治疗和再治疗病例之间在PLD变化方面均无统计学显著差异。此外,在随访期间两组之间在治疗结果评分方面也无显著差异。所有组均显示出高成功率。
对于伴有大型根尖周病变的未经治疗或再治疗的上颌切牙病例,使用BC封闭剂和SCT或AH Plus封闭剂和LCT均可成功治疗,在长达12个月的随访期内成功率相似且较高。