• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能在心理健康领域的伦理权衡。

Ethical trade-offs in AI for mental health.

作者信息

Holm Sune

机构信息

Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 29;15:1407562. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1407562. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1407562
PMID:39267699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11390554/
Abstract

It is expected that machine learning algorithms will enable better diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment in psychiatry. A central argument for deploying algorithmic methods in clinical decision-making in psychiatry is that they may enable not only faster and more accurate clinical judgments but also that they may provide a more objective foundation for clinical decisions. This article argues that the outputs of algorithms are never objective in the sense of being unaffected by human values and possibly biased choices. And it suggests that the best way to approach this is to ensure awareness of and transparency about the ethical trade-offs that must be made when developing an algorithm for mental health.

摘要

预计机器学习算法将在精神病学中实现更好的诊断、预后和治疗。在精神病学临床决策中采用算法方法的一个核心论点是,它们不仅可以实现更快、更准确的临床判断,还可以为临床决策提供更客观的基础。本文认为,算法的输出在不受人类价值观和可能存在的偏见选择影响的意义上绝不是客观的。并且它表明,处理这个问题的最佳方法是确保在开发心理健康算法时,对必须做出的伦理权衡有认识并保持透明。

相似文献

1
Ethical trade-offs in AI for mental health.人工智能在心理健康领域的伦理权衡。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 29;15:1407562. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1407562. eCollection 2024.
2
"Just" accuracy? Procedural fairness demands explainability in AI-based medical resource allocations.仅仅是“准确性”吗?程序公平性要求在基于人工智能的医疗资源分配中具备可解释性。
AI Soc. 2022 Dec 21:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01614-9.
3
Explainable AI for Bioinformatics: Methods, Tools and Applications.可解释人工智能在生物信息学中的应用:方法、工具与应用。
Brief Bioinform. 2023 Sep 20;24(5). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad236.
4
Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy.您的机器人治疗师现在为您服务:具身人工智能在精神病学、心理学和心理治疗中的伦理意义。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 9;21(5):e13216. doi: 10.2196/13216.
5
Toward Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics in AI for Social Media and Health Care: Scoping Review.迈向社交媒体和医疗保健领域人工智能的公平性、问责制、透明度和伦理:范围审查
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Apr 3;12:e50048. doi: 10.2196/50048.
6
Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.人工智能在医疗保健中的公平性:综述与建议。
Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Jan;42(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01474-3. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
7
On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare.论医疗保健中算法决策的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Mar;46(3):205-211. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105586. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
8
Call for the responsible artificial intelligence in the healthcare.呼吁在医疗保健中使用负责任的人工智能。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Dec 21;30(1):e100920. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100920.
9
Explainability in medicine in an era of AI-based clinical decision support systems.基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统时代的医学可解释性。
Front Genet. 2022 Sep 19;13:903600. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.903600. eCollection 2022.
10
An empirical characterization of fair machine learning for clinical risk prediction.用于临床风险预测的公平机器学习的实证特征描述。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Jan;113:103621. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103621. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges for Artificial Intelligence in Recognizing Mental Disorders.人工智能在识别精神障碍方面面临的挑战。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 20;13(1):2. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010002.
2
Screening for Adulthood ADHD and Comorbidities in a Tertiary Mental Health Center Using EarlyDetect: A Machine Learning-Based Pilot Study.采用 EarlyDetect 对三级精神卫生中心的成年 ADHD 及合并症进行筛查:基于机器学习的初步研究。
J Atten Disord. 2023 Feb;27(3):324-331. doi: 10.1177/10870547221136228. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
3
A clarification of the nuances in the fairness metrics landscape.厘清公平性指标领域的细微差别。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 10;12(1):4209. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07939-1.
4
Towards personalised predictive psychiatry in clinical practice: an ethical perspective.临床实践中迈向个性化预测精神病学:伦理视角
Br J Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;220(4):172-174. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2022.37.
5
Artificial intelligence in pulmonary medicine: computer vision, predictive model and COVID-19.人工智能在肺部医学中的应用:计算机视觉、预测模型和 COVID-19。
Eur Respir Rev. 2020 Oct 1;29(157). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0181-2020. Print 2020 Sep 30.
6
The benefit of foresight? An ethical evaluation of predictive testing for psychosis in clinical practice.前瞻性的好处?临床实践中预测精神病的预测测试的伦理评估。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;26:102228. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102228. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
7
Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health and Mental Illnesses: an Overview.人工智能在精神健康和精神疾病中的应用:概述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Nov 7;21(11):116. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1094-0.
8
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations.剖析用于管理人群健康的算法中的种族偏见。
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453. doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.
9
Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices.在基层医疗诊所中用于检测糖尿病视网膜病变的基于人工智能的自主诊断系统的关键试验。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Aug 28;1:39. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0040-6. eCollection 2018.
10
Machine learning in major depression: From classification to treatment outcome prediction.机器学习在重度抑郁症中的应用:从分类到治疗结局预测。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018 Nov;24(11):1037-1052. doi: 10.1111/cns.13048. Epub 2018 Aug 23.