Patel Aman M, Haleem Afash, Revercomb Lucy, Brant Jason A, Rajasekaran Karthik, Sun Lova L, Brody Robert M, Carey Ryan M
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Newark New Jersey USA.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Sep 14;9(5):e70000. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70000. eCollection 2024 Oct.
To investigate primary site surgical resection and overall survival (OS) in clinically distantly metastatic (cM1) oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).
The 2006-2018 National Cancer Database was queried for patients presenting with cM1 OCSCC who underwent chemotherapy. Binary logistic, Kaplan-Meier, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were implemented.
Of 278 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 139 (50.0%) underwent chemotherapy alone, 80 (28.8%) underwent chemoradiotherapy, 25 (9.0%) underwent surgical resection + adjuvant chemotherapy, and 34 (12.2%) underwent surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy; 5-year OS was 9.4%, 15.2%, 8.3%, and 23.8%, respectively ( < .001). Compared with those not undergoing surgical resection, patients undergoing surgical resection underwent radiotherapy more frequently (57.6% vs. 36.5%) but multiple-agent chemotherapy less frequently (40.7% vs. 74.4%) ( < .005). Twenty-one (36.2%) patients undergoing surgical resection had positive surgical margins. Academic facility (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.19, 95% CI 1.54-6.62) and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score ≥1 (aOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.25-6.32, < .025) were associated with increased odds of undergoing surgical resection. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83) and surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (aHR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21-0.66) were associated with higher OS ( < .005). Immunotherapy (aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.81, = .006) was also independently associated with higher OS.
A minority of patients with cM1 OCSCC underwent primary site surgical resection. Despite the high rate of positive surgical margins, surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with higher OS than chemotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy, or surgical resection + adjuvant chemotherapy. Definitive local therapy may benefit select patients with cM1 OCSCC.Level of evidence: 4.
探讨临床远处转移(cM1)口腔鳞状细胞癌(OCSCC)的原发灶手术切除及总生存期(OS)。
查询2006 - 2018年国家癌症数据库中接受化疗的cM1 OCSCC患者。采用二元逻辑回归、Kaplan - Meier法和多变量Cox比例风险回归模型。
278例符合纳入标准的患者中,139例(50.0%)仅接受化疗,80例(28.8%)接受放化疗,25例(9.0%)接受手术切除+辅助化疗,34例(12.2%)接受手术切除+辅助放化疗;5年总生存率分别为9.4%、15.2%、8.3%和23.8%(P<0.001)。与未接受手术切除的患者相比,接受手术切除的患者更常接受放疗(57.6%对36.5%),但接受多药化疗的频率较低(40.7%对74.4%)(P<0.005)。21例(36.2%)接受手术切除的患者手术切缘阳性。学术机构(校正比值比[aOR] 3.19,95%可信区间[CI] 1.54 - 6.62)和Charlson - Deyo合并症评分≥1(aOR 2.82,95% CI 1.25 - 6.32,P<0.025)与接受手术切除的几率增加相关。与单纯化疗相比,放化疗(校正风险比[aHR] 0.56,95% CI 0.38 - 0.83)和手术切除+辅助放化疗(aHR 0.37,95% CI 0.21 - 0.66)与更高的总生存期相关(P<0.005)。免疫治疗(aHR 0.48,95% CI 0.28 - 0.81,P = 0.006)也与更高的总生存期独立相关。
少数cM1 OCSCC患者接受了原发灶手术切除。尽管手术切缘阳性率高,但手术切除+辅助放化疗与单纯化疗、放化疗或手术切除+辅助化疗相比,总生存期更高。确定性局部治疗可能使部分cM1 OCSCC患者受益。证据级别:4级。