Scaggs Huang Felicia, Griffin Cameron, Fenchel Matthew, DuBose Melanie, Ankrum Andrea, Schaffzin Joshua K
Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 12;4(1):e128. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.359. eCollection 2024.
is normal skin flora but can cause sterile implant infections. We investigated a cluster of seven patients with in anaerobic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures in November 2020. Further analysis identified a missed outbreak, highlighting ambiguity in diagnosis of indolent organisms in the 2017 IDSA meningitis guidelines.
Outbreak investigation.
Quaternary pediatric facility.
A case was defined as a hospitalized patient with isolated from CSF culture from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2022.
We defined comparison periods based on timing of culture positivity as 1) pre-outbreak (2016-2020), 2) outbreak (2020-2021), and 3) post-outbreak (2022). Rates of positive cultures per 1000 CSF cultures and rate ratios were calculated by comparison periods.
We identified 9 positive CSF cultures among 7 cases November 10-27, 2020, all with at least 1 CSF diversion device. The anaerobic culture media was substituted at the time of case cluster. In 2021, the culture media was implemented permanently with no increase in culture positivity. The rate of positive CSF cultures and rate ratio increased in the outbreak period (p=0.01) compared to pre-outbreak and post-outbreak periods. There was no difference between the pre- and post-outbreak periods.
Retrospective analysis of CSF culture data led to reclassifying a pseudo-outbreak as a true outbreak in CSF diversion devices at our institution. Clearer guidance is needed to delineate the role of in CSF diversion device infections.
[某种细菌]是正常皮肤菌群,但可导致无菌植入物感染。我们调查了2020年11月在厌氧脑脊液(CSF)培养中出现的7例该菌感染患者群体。进一步分析发现了一次漏报的暴发,凸显了2017年美国感染病学会(IDSA)脑膜炎指南中对惰性微生物诊断的模糊性。
暴发调查。
四级儿科机构。
病例定义为2016年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间脑脊液培养分离出该菌的住院患者。
我们根据该菌培养阳性时间定义了比较期,分别为1)暴发前(2016 - 2020年)、2)暴发期(2020 - 2021年)和3)暴发后(2022年)。计算各比较期每1000份脑脊液培养中该菌阳性培养率及率比。
2020年11月10日至27日,我们在7例患者中发现9份该菌阳性脑脊液培养物,所有患者均至少有1个脑脊液分流装置。病例聚集期间更换了厌氧培养基。2021年,该培养基永久使用,该菌培养阳性率未增加。与暴发前和暴发后时期相比,暴发期该菌阳性脑脊液培养率及率比增加(p = 0.01)。暴发前和暴发后时期之间无差异。
对脑脊液培养数据的回顾性分析导致我们机构将一次该菌假暴发重新归类为脑脊液分流装置中的真正暴发。需要更明确的指导来界定该菌在脑脊液分流装置感染中的作用。