• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

LIpid 对他汀类药物±依折麦布的反应:孟买的一项横断面观察研究。

LIpid Response to Statins ± Ezetimibe In Mumbai (LIRIM): A Cross-sectional Observational Study.

机构信息

Director of Cardiology, Surana Sethia Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, Corresponding Author.

出版信息

J Assoc Physicians India. 2024 Sep;72(9):64-72. doi: 10.59556/japi.72.0622.

DOI:10.59556/japi.72.0622
PMID:39291519
Abstract

BACKGROUND

India has the highest burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among developing nations. Data from international studies show significant underimplementation of recommended aggressive lipid-lowering strategies for achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals, especially after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a pattern also observed in India. Moreover, ethnic variation in response to statin therapy has prompted clinicians to adopt lower doses of statin therapy in Asians to achieve comparable LDL-C lowering.

OBJECTIVE

To document the dose of statin ± ezetimibe required to achieve the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) goals of LDL-C <55 mg/dL in Indian patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center, cross-sectional, observational, all-comers study in Mumbai evaluated the dose of atorvastatin (A)/rosuvastatin (R) ± ezetimibe (E) treatment at which patients with established ASCVD ( 542), irrespective of their baseline level, achieved LDL-C goals (<55 mg/dL). Those with LDL-C levels >55 mg/dL on current therapy were switched to R 40 mg ± E 10 mg daily. The final data set ( 340) included those who achieved LDL-C goals at the initial visit and those at follow-up. The primary and secondary outcomes assessed the impact of R 40 mg ± E 10 mg (R40 ± E10) on LDL-C (<55 mg/dL) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [non-HDL-C (<85 mg/dL)] goal achievement, respectively.

RESULTS

At the end of follow-up, LDL-C <55 mg/dL was observed in 42.16% of patients ( 113) with R40 and in another 43.28% ( 116) with R40 + E10. A few patients ( 39; 14.6%) achieved this goal with other dosages. Similarly, non-HDL-C <85 mg/dL was observed in 39.3% of patients ( 107) with R40 and in another 47.4% of patients ( 129) with R40 + E10. Overall, around 20% of patients were unable to achieve their LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals despite being on high-intensity statin ± E therapy.

CONCLUSION

In the first report of its kind in India, this study showed that suboptimal LDL-C goal achievement occurred in around 20% of high-risk ASCVD patients on dual therapy. This indicates that clinicians should consider the addition of other therapies [e.g., bempedoic acid, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, and inclisiran] to mitigate the residual risk. Several more trials are needed to determine the most suitable treatment regimen for this population.

摘要

背景

印度是发展中国家中心血管疾病(CVD)负担最重的国家。来自国际研究的数据表明,在推荐的降脂治疗策略方面,实现低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标的执行情况严重不足,尤其是在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)之后,这种情况在印度也同样存在。此外,他汀类药物治疗反应的种族差异促使临床医生在亚洲人群中采用较低剂量的他汀类药物治疗来实现可比的 LDL-C 降低。

目的

记录在印度患有已确立的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的患者中,实现欧洲心脏病学会(ESC) LDL-C<55mg/dL 目标所需的他汀类药物±依折麦布的剂量。

材料和方法

这项在孟买进行的回顾性单中心、横断面、观察性、所有患者研究评估了阿托伐他汀(A)/罗苏伐他汀(R)±依折麦布(E)治疗剂量,使已确立的 ASCVD 患者(542 例)达到 LDL-C 目标(<55mg/dL),无论其基线水平如何。那些当前治疗 LDL-C 水平>55mg/dL 的患者被转换为每天 R40mg±E10mg。最终数据集(340 例)包括在初次就诊时和随访时达到 LDL-C 目标的患者。主要和次要结局分别评估了 R40mg±E10mg(R40±E10)对 LDL-C(<55mg/dL)和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇[非-HDL-C(<85mg/dL)]目标达成的影响。

结果

随访结束时,42.16%(113 例)接受 R40 治疗的患者和 43.28%(116 例)接受 R40+E10 治疗的患者 LDL-C<55mg/dL。少数患者(39 例;14.6%)用其他剂量达到了这一目标。同样,39.3%(107 例)接受 R40 治疗的患者和 47.4%(129 例)接受 R40+E10 治疗的患者非-HDL-C<85mg/dL。总的来说,尽管接受高强度他汀类药物±E 治疗,但约 20%的患者仍无法达到 LDL-C 和非-HDL-C 目标。

结论

在印度此类研究的首次报告中,该研究表明,在接受双重治疗的高危 ASCVD 患者中,约 20%的患者 LDL-C 目标未得到充分实现。这表明临床医生应考虑添加其他治疗方法[例如,贝匹达酸、前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素 9(PCSK9)抑制剂和inclisiran]来减轻残余风险。还需要更多的试验来确定最适合该人群的治疗方案。

相似文献

1
LIpid Response to Statins ± Ezetimibe In Mumbai (LIRIM): A Cross-sectional Observational Study.LIpid 对他汀类药物±依折麦布的反应:孟买的一项横断面观察研究。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2024 Sep;72(9):64-72. doi: 10.59556/japi.72.0622.
2
Simulation of Lipid-Lowering Therapy Intensification in a Population With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.模拟动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的降脂治疗强化。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Sep 1;2(9):959-966. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2289.
3
Ezetimibe Use and LDL-C Goal Achievement: A Retrospective Database Analysis of Patients with Clinical Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease or Probable Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.依折麦布的使用与 LDL-C 达标:临床动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病或杂合子型家族性高胆固醇血症患者的回顾性数据库分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Dec;23(12):1270-1276. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.16414. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
4
Changes in LDL-C levels and goal attainment associated with addition of ezetimibe to simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin compared with titrating statin monotherapy.与他汀类单药治疗滴定相比,依折麦布联合辛伐他汀、阿托伐他汀或瑞舒伐他汀治疗时低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平的变化及目标达成情况。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:719-27. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S49840. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
5
Simulation of the Impact of Statin Intolerance on the Need for Ezetimibe and/or Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitor for Meeting Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goals in a Population With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.他汀类药物不耐受对满足动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标的依折麦布和/或前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素 9 抑制剂需求的影响模拟。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Apr 15;123(8):1202-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.01.028. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
6
Impact of Switching From High-Efficacy Lipid-Lowering Therapies to Generic Simvastatin on LDL-C Levels and LDL-C Goal Attainment Among High-Risk Primary and Secondary Prevention Populations in the United Kingdom.在英国高危一级和二级预防人群中,从高效降脂疗法转换为普通辛伐他汀对低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平及LDL-C目标达成情况的影响。
Clin Ther. 2015 Apr 1;37(4):804-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.12.019. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
7
Patient and physician factors influence decision-making in hypercholesterolemia: a questionnaire-based survey.患者和医生因素影响高胆固醇血症的决策:一项基于问卷调查的研究。
Lipids Health Dis. 2015 May 19;14:45. doi: 10.1186/s12944-015-0037-y.
8
Lipid lowering therapy in primary and secondary prevention in Austria: are LDL-C goals achieved? : Results from the DA VINCI study.降脂治疗在奥地利的一级和二级预防中的应用:是否达到了 LDL-C 目标?:来自 DA VINCI 研究的结果。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2022 Apr;134(7-8):294-301. doi: 10.1007/s00508-021-01978-w. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
9
The therapeutic management of South African dyslipidaemic patients at very high cardiovascular risk (CARDIO TRACK): a cross-sectional study.南非极高心血管风险(CARDIO TRACK)血脂异常患者的治疗管理:一项横断面研究。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2020 Sep/Oct;31(5):245-251. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2020-010.
10
Lipid-lowering treatment up to one year after acute coronary syndrome: guidance from a French expert panel for the implementation of guidelines in practice.急性冠脉综合征后降脂治疗一年:法国专家组对指南实施的指导意见。
Panminerva Med. 2023 Jun;65(2):244-249. doi: 10.23736/S0031-0808.22.04777-2. Epub 2022 Oct 12.