Suppr超能文献

[Priority setting in intensive care from an ethical perspective].

作者信息

Juth Niklas, Hannerz Schmidtke Eva

机构信息

professor, professor, Centrum för forskningsetik och bioetik, Uppsala universitet.

med dr, specialistläkare, anestesi och intensivvård, bitr överläkare, intensivvårdssektionen, Anopiva, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala.

出版信息

Lakartidningen. 2024 Sep 18;121:23193.

Abstract

Priority setting at intensive care units is legally regulated in accordance with the so-called ethical platform, which states that all priorities must be based on three lexically ranked principles: the principle of human dignity (a ban on discrimination, e.g. based on social standing), the principle of needs and solidarity, and the principle of cost-effectiveness. Prioritization for intensive care is particularly difficult as it requires comparisons between widely different patient categories, occurs in acute situations and is fraught with great uncertainty about the prognosis. Sometimes the degree of severity is maximal for several patients: without treatment, they die. Then treatment effect and cost-effectiveness become more decisive for prioritization decisions. Moreover, withholding and withdrawing intensive care are increasingly considered as morally equivalent. Difficult priority decisions risk moral stress among the intensive care staff.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验