Suppr超能文献

在卢塞恩农村地区的专业流动姑息治疗服务试点项目中开展的跨专业合作。

Interprofessional collaboration during a specialised mobile palliative care service pilot in the rural area of Lucerne.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland.

Cantonal Hospital Luzern, Palliative Care, Luzern, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0308256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308256. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Interprofessional collaboration in outpatient palliative care is critical to ensuring good quality of care in the home care sector. We investigated facilitators and barriers (FaBs) of interprofessional collaboration among healthcare professionals who participated in a 6-month pilot of a newly implemented specialised mobile palliative care service (SMPCS) in rural Lucerne. This study used a mixed-methods approach to collect (i) qualitative data on FaBs as perceived by nurses and primary care physicians (PCPs), and (ii) quantitative data across the entire interprofessional collaboration using a validated questionnaire expanded with 10 specific questions about the pilot. Identified facilitators of interprofessional collaboration were (i) use of standardised documents, (ii) clear allocation of responsibilities, (iii) regular exchange and clear communication and (iv) consideration of care coordination. Reported barriers were (i) a deficit of knowledge and experience of palliative care among PCPs and (ii) time constraints. This study provides valuable insights into FaBs of interprofessional collaboration in palliative care. Several recommendations can be drawn for how interprofessional collaboration may be optimised. Awareness of FaBs and their consideration in the implementation phase of new services can strengthen the foundation for a successful interprofessional collaboration.

摘要

多专业协作在门诊姑息治疗中至关重要,可确保家庭护理领域的高质量护理。我们调查了参与新实施的农村卢塞恩专门移动姑息治疗服务(SMPCS)6 个月试点的医疗保健专业人员之间的多专业协作的促进因素和障碍(FaBs)。这项研究采用混合方法收集了(i)护士和初级保健医生(PCP)感知到的 FaBs 的定性数据,以及(ii)使用经过验证的问卷收集整个多专业协作的定量数据,并扩展了 10 个关于试点的具体问题。确定的多专业协作促进因素包括(i)使用标准化文件,(ii)明确分配责任,(iii)定期交流和清晰沟通,以及(iv)考虑护理协调。报告的障碍包括(i)PCP 对姑息治疗的知识和经验不足,以及(ii)时间限制。这项研究提供了姑息治疗中多专业协作的 FaBs 的宝贵见解。可以为如何优化多专业协作提出一些建议。在新服务的实施阶段,了解 FaBs 并考虑到它们,可以为成功的多专业协作奠定基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c57/11410264/98ba164aba5a/pone.0308256.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验